Key result
Pediatric heart transplant recipients show ~48% lower resting RV TDI velocities but preserve exercise functional response.
Why the study?
Right ventricular dysfunction is a common problem after heart transplantation in pediatric patients, but RV systolic and diastolic reserve during exercise has not been fully evaluated.
Does semi-supine bicycle ergometry stress echocardiography reveal impaired right ventricular functional reserve in pediatric heart transplant recipients compared to controls?
Observational (n=62)
Does semi-supine bicycle ergometry stress echocardiography reveal impaired right ventricular functional reserve in pediatric heart transplant recipients compared to controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.4% vs 10.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
Pediatric heart transplant recipients demonstrate preserved right ventricular systolic and diastolic functional response to exercise, despite lower resting values.
Preserved RV exercise response in pediatric HTx supports normal functional reserve; hypothesis-generating for blunted IVA.
Aims: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is a common problem after heart transplant (HTx). In this study, we used semi-supine bicycle ergometry (SSBE) stress echocardiography to evaluate RV systolic and diastolic reserve in paediatric HTx recipients. Methods and results: Thirty-nine pediatric HTx recipients and 23 controls underwent stepwise SSBE stress echocardiography. Colour tissue doppler imaging (TDI) peak systolic (s') and peak diastolic (e') velocities, myocardial acceleration during isovolumic contraction (IVA), and RV free wall longitudinal strain were measured at incremental heart rates (HR). The relationship with increasing HR was evaluated for each parameter by plotting values at each stage of exercise versus HR using linear and non-linear regression models. At rest, HTx recipients had higher HR with lower TDI velocities (s': 5.4 ± 1.7 vs. 10.4 ± 1.8 cm/s, P < 0.001; e': 6.4 ± 2.2 vs.12 ± 2.4 cm/s, P < 0.001) and RV IVA values (IVA: 1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 1.6 ± 0.8 m/s2, P = 0.04), while RV free wall longitudinal strain was similar between groups. At peak exercise, HR was higher in controls and all measurements of RV function were significantly lower in HTx recipients, except for RV free wall longitudinal strain. When assessing the increase in each parameter vs. HR, the slopes were not significantly different between patients and controls except for IVA, which was lower in HTx recipients. Conclusion: In pediatric HTx recipients RV systolic and diastolic functional response to exercise is preserved with a normal increase in TDI velocities and strain values with increasing HR. The blunted IVA response possibly indicates a mildly decreased RV contractile response but it requires further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cifra et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Heart transplantation (n=62). Heart transplantation vs. Controls was evaluated on TDI peak systolic (s') velocity at rest (cm/s) (p=<0.001). Pediatric heart transplant recipients had lower resting RV TDI velocities (s': 5.4 vs 10.4 cm/s, P<0.001) but maintained a preserved functional response to exercise compared to controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: