Key result
Eplerenone cuts aldosterone levels by ~32% vs. spironolactone in class III heart failure.
Why the study?
The effects of spironolactone and eplerenone on left ventricular diastolic function and neurohumoral factors in patients with heart failure were studied to clarify their impact across HF classes.
Does eplerenone compared to spironolactone improve neurohumoral factors in patients with heart failure?
RCT (n=131)
Randomized
Does eplerenone compared to spironolactone improve neurohumoral factors in patients with heart failure?
Eplerenone appears more effective than spironolactone in reducing aldosterone levels in patients with NYHA class III heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
HF severity and LV diastolic dysfunction were associated with elevated neurohumoral factors; hypothesis-generating for MRA effects on diastolic function.
Aim. To study the effects of spironolactone and eplerenone on left ventricular diastolic function and neurohumoral factors in patients with heart failure (HF). Material and methods. We examined 131 patients with coronary artery disease and NYHA class I-III HF. Patients were randomized into groups depending on HF class: class I (n=31), class II (n=51) and class III (n=49). Results. The study revealed that the clinical course of HF and LV diastolic dysfunction are associated with an increased level of neurohormones and are characterized by significantly high levels of aldosterone and norepinephrine in patients with a restrictiveLV diastolic dysfunction. A correlation was found between the level of neurohormones (aldosterone and norepinephrine) and heart remodeling parameters: an inverse correlation with an ejection fraction (r=-0,68, r=-0,61, respectively) and a direct correlation with LV end-diastolic volume (r=0,58, r=0,66, respectively). Long-term treatment with spironolactone and eplerenone had a positive effect, reducing the level of mentioned neurohormones. In patients with class II HF, both drugs had a positive effect on the level of aldosterone and norepinephrine, reducing them by 26,6% and 20,2% in the spironolactone group and by 28,4% and 24,6% in the eplerenone group, respectively. In patients with class III HF, the decrease in aldosterone level was more pronounced in those taking eplerenone than spironolactone: 32,1% vs 20,2%, respectively. Conclusion. In patients with HF, combination therapy with the inclusion of spironolactone significantly reduced the level of neurohormones mainly in patients with class II HF and, to a lesser extent, in those with class III HF. This suggests that combination therapy with spironolactone is less effective than with eplerenone in relation to neurohormones’ levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nuritdinov et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Heart failure (n=131). Eplerenone vs. Spironolactone was evaluated on Reduction in aldosterone level in class III heart failure. Eplerenone reduced aldosterone levels more than spironolactone in patients with class III heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: