Key result
Separate tachogram heart rate turbulence assessment correlates strongly with conventional 24-hour methods.
Why the study?
There is little information on whether short-term heart rate turbulence assessment is comparable to 24 h assessment for autonomic function evaluation.
Does an alternative method of calculating HRT parameters from isolated tachograms correlate with the conventional 24-hour average method in outpatients?
Observational (n=116)
Does an alternative method of calculating HRT parameters from isolated tachograms correlate with the conventional 24-hour average method in outpatients?
Effect estimate: r=0.84 for TS, r=0.99 for TO
p-value: p=<0.001
HRT assessment by separate tachograms correlates highly with standard 24-hour Holter recordings, though turbulence slope values may need redefinition due to blunting in the conventional method.
Both heart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate turbulence (HRT) are established tools to study cardiac autonomic activity. Short-term studies of HRV had been reported to be stable for autonomic function assessment. However, there is little information on whether short-term HRT assessment is comparable to 24 h assessment. The aim of the study is to identify the relationship of HRT values between the 24 h and isolated tachogram measurements. We collected 24 h Holter recordings from 116 patients attending the outpatient department. HRT parameters were assessed for 24 h. Using the conventional method, HRT parameters were calculated using the average of tachograms over long-term recordings. In an alternative method, HRT parameters were obtained from each tachogram. We calculated a mean value for each subject by averaging the whole HRT data of every tachogram. Correlation analysis between the two groups of HRT values was performed. The results showed a high correlation between the two methods in turbulence slope (TS) (P<0.001; r=0.84) and an extremely significant correlation in turbulence onset (TO) (P<0.001; r=0.99). The values of TS were increased when assessed by separate tachogram. The variations became prominent when TS values calculated by the conventional method were low. HRT is as useful by separate tachogram assessment as by the standard Holter recordings. However, the TS values should be redefined. In subjects with abnormal turbulence slope (<2.5) calculated by averaging long-term recordings, the possibility of TS values blunted by diverse regression slope sequences in separate tachograms should be taken into consideration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hung Yi Chen (2011) conducted an observational in Outpatient (n=116). Separate tachogram assessment of heart rate turbulence vs. Conventional method (average of tachograms over long-term recordings) was evaluated on Correlation of turbulence slope (TS) and turbulence onset (TO) between the two methods (r=0.84 for TS, r=0.99 for TO, p=<0.001). Separate tachogram assessment of heart rate turbulence correlated highly with the conventional 24-hour method for turbulence slope (r=0.84, P<0.001) and turbulence onset (r=0.99, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: