Key result
LMIC residence is linked to ~0.5-year higher excess predicted vascular age versus the US.
Why the study?
Low- and middle-income countries lack well-established, low-technology methods to quantify and communicate cardiovascular disease risk at population or individual levels.
Cross-Sectional (n=35,820)
Yes
Mean Difference: 0.46 (95% CI 0.01–0.9)
p-value: p=0.044
The use of predicted heart/vascular age reveals a high prevalence of excess cardiovascular risk in several low- and middle-income countries compared to the US, highlighting the need for tailored preventive interventions.
Almost 80% of the global burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) occurs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, LMICs do not have well-established, low-technology ways to quantify and communicate CVD risk at population or individual levels. We examined predicted heart/vascular age (PHA) in six LMICs and the United States. Data were from CVD-free adults in World Health Organization Study on Global Aging and Adult Health (n = 29094) and US National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (n = 6726). PHA was calculated using the non-laboratory Framingham CVD risk equation. High excess PHA (HEPHA) was defined as the differences between PHA and chronological age >5 years. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with HEPHA. Age-standardized prevalence of HEPHA was higher in Russia 52%; China 56%; Mexico 59%; and South Africa 65% compared to the US 45%, Ghana 36%; and India 38%. In LMICs, higher income, being divorced/widowed, alcohol intake and abdominal obesity had higher odds of HEPHA; higher education, fruit intake and physical activity had lower odds of HEPHA. The use of PHA may offer a useful avenue to communicate CVD risk. Interventions tailored at socioeconomic and cultural factors that influence CVD risk factors may be necessary to prevent CVD in LMICs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Appiah et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease risk (n=35,820). Residence in low- and middle-income countries vs. Residence in the United States was evaluated on Mean excess predicted heart/vascular age (difference between predicted and chronological age) (MD 0.46, 95% CI 0.01-0.90, p=0.044). Residence in low- and middle-income countries was associated with a 0.46-year higher mean excess predicted heart/vascular age compared to the United States.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: