Key result
Prominent subclavian valve triggers venous spasm during guidewire manipulation for pacemaker implantation.
Why the study?
Subclavian venous spasm is an uncommon complication during permanent pacemaker implantation with unclear exact aetiology.
Case Report (n=1)
Early identification of an impeding subclavian vein valve and obtaining access medial to the valve may help prevent venous spasm during pacemaker implantation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights subclavian valve as access obstacle; leaves open whether medial puncture prevents spasm in device implantation.
BACKGROUND: Subclavian venous spasm is an uncommon complication during permanent pacemaker implantation. The exact aetiology of subclavian venous spasm is not clear but has been suggested to be due to either mechanical irritation of the vein during needle puncture or due to chemical irritation from contrast injection. Here, we report a case of an unyielding subclavian vein valve that impeded guidewire advancement and the repeated guidewire manipulation led to venous spasm. CASE SUMMARY: A 45-year-old woman with a history of surgical repair of Tetrology of Fallot in childhood presented with symptomatic bifascicular block and underwent a permanent pacemaker implantation. A subclavian venogram done prior to the procedure showed a prominent valve in the distal portion of the vein. Following venous puncture, guidewire advancement was impeded by the prominent valve. The resulting guidewire manipulation led to subclavian venous spasm necessitating a medial subclavian venous puncture and access. DISCUSSION: Prolonged mechanical irritation of the vein during pacemaker implantation may lead to venous spasm impeding pacemaker implantation. Early identification of an impeding valve and obtaining access medial to the valve may help prevent this uncommon complication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krishnappa et al. (2019) conducted a case report in Symptomatic bifascicular block (n=1). Guidewire manipulation during pacemaker implantation was evaluated on Subclavian venous spasm. Guidewire manipulation impeded by a prominent subclavian vein valve led to subclavian venous spasm during permanent pacemaker implantation in a 45-year-old woman.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: