Key result
In men, 6-week treatment with ziprasidone decreased baseline Framingham risk score by 11.06% compared to a 7.69% increase with olanzapine.
Why the study?
The impact of short-term treatment with ziprasidone versus olanzapine on Framingham risk score in patients with schizophrenia was unclear.
Does ziprasidone improve Framingham risk score and lipid profiles compared to olanzapine in hospitalized adults with schizophrenia?
RCT
Double-blind
randomly assigned
Does ziprasidone improve Framingham risk score and lipid profiles compared to olanzapine in hospitalized adults with schizophrenia?
Short-term treatment with olanzapine is associated with a significant worsening of lipid profiles compared to ziprasidone in patients with schizophrenia, potentially increasing cardiovascular risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Olanzapine was associated with rising FRS versus ziprasidone in short-term schizophrenia treatment; leaves open longer-term CV risk confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the change in Framingham risk score (FRS) arising from short-term treatment with ziprasidone or olanzapine. METHOD: Hospitalized adults with a primary DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizo-affective disorder were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with ziprasidone or olanzapine from November 21, 1998 to September 28, 2000. Data on fasting lipid levels were collected at screening and endpoint, and blood pressure was measured at screening and baseline and weekly until week 6 of treatment (or last visit). FRS for patients aged ≥30 years was calculated using an algorithm derived from the Framingham Heart Study. Baseline-to-endpoint least-squares mean changes in age-adjusted FRS by gender were compared using analysis of covariance (baseline adjusted). RESULTS: Men who received olanzapine demonstrated a mean increase in their total cholesterol levels (+18.5 mg/dL; N = 53) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (+13.0 mg/dL; N = 45), whereas men who received ziprasidone demonstrated a mean decrease in their total cholesterol levels (-8.5 mg/dL; N = 44) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (-7.2 mg/dL; N = 40) (p = .0006 and p = .004, respectively). Additionally, men who received olanzapine showed an increase in baseline FRS (+7.69%; N = 53), whereas men who received ziprasidone showed a decrease in baseline FRS (-11.06%; N = 42) (p = .09). In women, treatment differences in FSR numerically favored ziprasidone but were not statistically significant. Neither treatment had a significant effect on blood pressure. CONCLUSION: In short-term treatment, olanza-pine was associated with a significant worsening of lipid profile compared with ziprasidone, with a consequent increase in FRS versus ziprasidone. These findings, coupled with the significant weight gain in patients treated with olanzapine versus ziprasidone, warrant investigation in longer-term trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valle et al. (2006) conducted an RCT in Schizophrenia or schizo-affective disorder. Ziprasidone vs. Olanzapine was evaluated on Change in Framingham risk score (FRS) (p=0.09). In men, 6-week treatment with ziprasidone decreased baseline Framingham risk score by 11.06% compared to a 7.69% increase with olanzapine.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: