Key result
Incomplete revascularization is linked to ~33% higher mortality after mitral intervention in ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
Ischemic mitral regurgitation is associated with substantial mortality risk, and surgical mitral valve intervention has not been shown to improve survival, necessitating identification of mortality predictors.
What are the predictors of mortality in patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing surgical mitral valve intervention?
Cohort (n=117)
What are the predictors of mortality in patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing surgical mitral valve intervention?
Absolute Event Rate: 61% vs 28%
p-value: p=<0.001
Increased total scar burden and incomplete revascularization assessed by CMR are powerful predictors of mortality in patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing surgical mitral valve intervention.
Scar burden and incomplete revascularization identify high-risk post-MVi patients; leaves open whether CMR-guided viability assessment improves selection or survival.
Background Ischemic mitral regurgitation is associated with substantial risk of death. Although surgical mitral valve intervention ( MV i) may improve symptoms, it has not been shown to improve survival. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of mortality in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation and MV i. Methods and Results We evaluated 117 consecutive patients (age, 65±10 years) with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance and subsequent MV i between January 1, 2002 and January 1, 2012. Cardiac magnetic resonance was used to assess left ventricular remodeling and myocardial scarring. The effective regurgitant orifice area was calculated from the proximal isovelocity surface area by echocardiography. There were 43 deaths (37%) during follow‐up (median, 62 months). On multivariable analysis, age ≥70 years ( P =0.013), diabetes mellitus ( P =0.001), dyslipidemia ( P =0.012), papillary muscle scar ( P =0.010), incomplete revascularization ( P =0.001), and total scar %×effective regurgitant orifice area ≥0.20 cm 2 ( P =0.005) were each independently associated with all‐cause mortality. Although patients with effective regurgitant orifice area <0.2 cm 2 at baseline demonstrated an increased hazard ratio of 3.3 for every 10% increase in scar, the hazard ratio increased to 9 for every 10% increase in scar in those with baseline effective regurgitant orifice area ≥0.20 cm 2 . Mortality also was significantly higher in patients with incomplete revascularization compared with those with vascularized viable myocardium (61% versus 28%; P <0.001). Conclusions Increased total scar burden and the presence of incomplete revascularization are powerful predictors of mortality in patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing MV i. Viability assessment with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can identify which patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation are at highest risk for mortality after surgical MV i.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kusunose et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy with ischemic mitral regurgitation (n=117). Incomplete revascularization vs. Vascularized viable myocardium was evaluated on all-cause mortality (p=<0.001). Incomplete revascularization (61% vs 28% mortality; P<0.001) and increased scar burden strongly predicted mortality in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing mitral valve intervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: