Key result
Aspirin remains foundational for preventing thrombotic events and MI, with emerging potential in dementia and cancer.
Why the study?
The evolving clinical roles and potential benefits of aspirin in various conditions beyond vascular event prophylaxis remain to be fully characterized.
Aspirin remains a foundational therapy for the prevention and acute management of thrombotic cardiovascular events.
Supports low-dose aspirin post-thrombosis as potentially cost-effective; leaves open updated modeling with current event rates and pricing.
Many folk remedies used since pre-historic times have depended upon salicylates for their effect. One hundred years ago aspirin was formulated from salicylic and acetic acids. It was the first drug to be synthesised and its formulation is regarded as the foundation of the modern pharmaceutical industry. The benefit of low-dose aspirin as a prophylactic after a thrombotic event was first reported 25 years ago. Its use after coronary or cerebral thrombosis is virtually mandatory, unless there are signs of intolerance. A 'loading dose' of soluble aspirin should be given on first contact with a patient who may be suffering from myocardial infarction. Patients considered to be at increased risk of a vascular event should also be advised to carry their own aspirin and, if they experience sudden severe chest pain, to chew and swallow a 300 mg tablet or a soluble preparation immediately. The current phase of the aspirin story is, however, not over, and its possible value in a variety of conditions, including dementia and certain cancers, seems likely to ensure that it will long continue to play a remarkable part in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
P C Elwood (2001) conducted a review in Thrombotic events and myocardial infarction. Aspirin was evaluated. Aspirin remains a foundational therapy for the prophylaxis of thrombotic events and acute myocardial infarction, with potential future applications in dementia and cancer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: