Key result
Percutaneous ASD closure fails to reduce migraine prevalence with or without aura.
Why the study?
The effect of percutaneous atrial septal defect closure on migraine occurrence was unclear and needed investigation.
Does percutaneous ASD closure reduce the prevalence of migraine in adult patients?
Cohort (n=75)
Does percutaneous ASD closure reduce the prevalence of migraine in adult patients?
p-value: P=0.18 (MA-) and P=0.55 (MA+)
Percutaneous ASD closure did not significantly decrease the overall prevalence of migraine, though attack frequency decreased in a subgroup with prior typical migraine.
Does not support ASD closure for migraine; leaves open any effect in selected patients pending randomized trials.
AIMS: Percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure seems to influence migraine. We wanted to observe the effect of percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) closure on migraine. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients (>16 years of age) with a percutaneous ASD closure were selected from our database (n=114). A questionnaire about headache before and after closure was sent. According to the criteria of the International Headache Society, two neurologists diagnosed migraine with and without aura (MA+ and MA-, respectively). McNemar paired chi(2) and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used where applicable. Seventy-five patients (66%, 59 females, mean age 51+/-19 years) responded and were included in the study. An Amplatzer ASD occluder was used in all. Median follow-up time was 29 months (IQ1 and IQ3, 18 and 39 months, respectively). The prevalence of MA- and MA+ changed from 19 (14/75) and 11% (8/75), respectively, before closure to 12 (9/75) and 15% (11/75), respectively, after closure (P=0.18 and P=0.55, respectively, vs. before closure). In 12 patients who suffered from migraine before closure (n=4 and 8, MA+ and MA-, respectively), migraine disappeared. In this subgroup, the frequency of migraine attacks decreased significantly (P=0.01). New-onset migraine was noted in 10 patients (n=7 and 3, MA+ and MA-, respectively). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous ASD closure was not related to a decrease in prevalence of migraine. In a subgroup, patients who suffered from typical migraine before ASD closure, the frequency of migraine attacks decreased significantly. The reason for the new-onset migraine remains unexplained. A larger study sample will be necessary to determine these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mortelmans et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Atrial septal defect and migraine (n=75). Percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) closure vs. Before closure (baseline) was evaluated on Prevalence of migraine with and without aura before and after closure (p=P=0.18 (MA-) and P=0.55 (MA+)). Percutaneous ASD closure did not significantly change the prevalence of migraine without aura (19% vs 12%, P=0.18) or with aura (11% vs 15%, P=0.55) compared to baseline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: