Key result
Slow pathway bumping during AVNRT occurs in ~21%, potentially explaining higher recurrence during sinus rhythm cryomapping.
Why the study?
Slow pathway bumping during cryoablation of AVNRT was observed but its frequency and implications were not well characterized.
Does catheter manipulation during cryoablation cause slow pathway bumping in patients with AVNRT?
Cohort (n=68)
Does catheter manipulation during cryoablation cause slow pathway bumping in patients with AVNRT?
Slow pathway bumping is a frequent phenomenon during cryocatheter ablation of AVNRT, which may explain higher recurrence rates compared to radiofrequency ablation when cryomapping is performed in sinus rhythm.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May signal higher AVNRT recurrence after cryoablation; leaves open whether mapping adjustments improve outcomes in prospective trials.
INTRODUCTION: Between 2005 and 2022, 364 patients were treated with cryoenergy for atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT). After we noticed that bumping of the slow pathway could occur a cohort of 68 consecutive patients, highly symptomatic, were prospectively studied between 2005 and 2008 for the occurrence of bumping of the slow pathway or other nodal structures during catheter manipulation. The analysis was stopped after 68 patients based on the results obtained. Slow pathway bumping was defined as the ability to induce sustained tachycardia at the baseline but not anymore after manipulation of the ablation catheter, before any energy delivery attempt was made, linked to slow pathway conduction impairment. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 63 patients a sustained tachycardia could repeatedly be induced at the baseline state when only diagnostic catheters were in place. In 20.6% of these patients (13 pat) bumping occurred. The bumping was linked to the slow pathway in 12 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Slow pathway bumping is a frequent phenomenon in the setting of cryocatheter ablation of AVNRT. It might explain the higher recurrence rate compared with radiofrequency (RF) when cryomapping is done during sinus rhythm rather than during ongoing tachycardia. It may also explain some cases of tachycardia non inducibility at the baseline. It also has implications when the ablation is done with radiofrequency current: in the case an accelerated nodal rhythm is absent after energy application but tachycardia is no more inducible slow pathway bumping may also be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verbeet et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (n=68). Cryoablation catheter manipulation was evaluated on Occurrence of bumping of the slow pathway or other nodal structures during catheter manipulation. During cryocatheter manipulation for AVNRT, slow pathway bumping occurred in 20.6% of patients, potentially explaining higher recurrence rates when cryomapping is done during sinus rhythm.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: