Key result
Persistent AF linked to ~130% more right atrial EGM fractionation vs paroxysmal AF.
Why the study?
Little is known regarding the characterization of electrical substrate in both atria in patients with atrial fibrillation.
What are the differences in bi-atrial electrical substrate characteristics between patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=8)
What are the differences in bi-atrial electrical substrate characteristics between patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 10.8% vs 4.7%
p-value: p=0.036
Bi-atrial electrical substrate abnormalities, including low voltage areas and slow conduction corridors, are present in both paroxysmal and persistent AF and progress with arrhythmia persistence.
May inform right atrial substrate mapping in persistent AF; extends fractionation data but remains hypothesis-generating.
Background Little is known regarding the characterization of electrical substrate in both atria in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods Eight consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation (five paroxysmal, three persistent) underwent electrical substrate characterization during sinus rhythm. Mapping of the left (LA) and right atrium (RA) was performed with the use of the HD Grid catheter (Abbott). Bipolar voltage maps were analyzed to search for low voltage areas (LVA), the following electrophysiological phenomena were assessed: (1) slow conduction corridors, and (2) lines of block. EGMs were characterized to search for fractionation. Electrical characteristics were compared between atria and between paroxysmal versus persistent AF patients. Results In the RA, LVAs were present in 60% of patients with paroxysmal AF and 100% of patients with persistent AF. In the LA, LVAs were present in 40% of patients with paroxysmal AF and 66% of patients with persistent AF. The areas of LVA in the RA and LA were 4.8±7.3 cm2 and 7.8±13.6 cm2 in patients with paroxysmal AF versus 11.7±3.0 cm2 and 2.1±1.8 cm2 in patients with persistent AF. In the RA, slow conduction corridors were present in 40.0% (paroxysmal AF) versus 66.7% (persistent AF) whereas in the LA, slow conduction corridors occurred in 20.0% versus 33.3% respectively (p = ns). EGM analysis showed more fractionation in persistent AF patients than paroxysmal (RA: persistent AF 10.8 vs. paroxysmal AF 4.7%, p = .036, LA: 10.3 vs. 4.1%, p = .108). Conclusion Bi‐atrial involvement is present in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. This is expressed by low voltage areas and slow conduction corridors whose extension progresses as the arrhythmia becomes persistent. This electrophysiological substrate demonstrates the important interplay with the pulmonary vein triggers to constitute the substrate for persistent arrhythmia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giorgios et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=8). Persistent atrial fibrillation vs. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Electrogram fractionation in the right atrium (p=0.036). Persistent atrial fibrillation is associated with significantly more right atrial electrogram fractionation compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (10.8% vs 4.7%, p=0.036).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: