Key result
Paroxysmal lone AF is linked to ~36% larger right atrial volumes vs. controls.
Why the study?
It was uncertain whether patients with paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation have an abnormal atrial substrate.
Does paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation associate with an abnormal atrial substrate compared to reference patients?
Case-Control (n=50)
Does paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation associate with an abnormal atrial substrate compared to reference patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 94% vs 69%
p-value: p=0.003
Paroxysmal lone AF is associated with structural changes, conduction abnormalities, and sinus node dysfunction, providing evidence for a proarrhythmic abnormal atrial substrate even without active arrhythmia.
Abnormal atrial substrate in paroxysmal lone AF supports remodeling hypothesis; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with paroxysmal "lone" atrial fibrillation (AF) have an abnormal atrial substrate. BACKGROUND: While "AF begets AF," prompt termination to prevent electrical remodeling does not prevent disease progression. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with paroxysmal lone AF, without arrhythmia in the week prior, and 25 reference patients with left-sided accessory pathways were studied. Multipolar catheters placed at the lateral right atrium (RA), crista terminalis, coronary sinus, septal RA, and sequentially within the left atrium (LA) determined the effective refractory period (ERP) at 10 sites, conduction time along linear catheters, and conduction characteristics at the crista terminalis. Bi-atrial electroanatomic maps were created to determine regional differences in conduction velocity and voltage. RESULTS: Patients with AF demonstrated the following compared with reference patients: larger atrial volumes (RA: 94 +/- 18 ml vs. 69 +/- 9 ml, p = 0.003; LA: 99 +/- 19 ml vs. 77 +/- 17 ml, p = 0.006); longer ERP (at 600 ms: 255 +/- 25 ms vs. 222 +/- 16 ms, p < 0.001; at 450 ms: 234 +/- 20 ms vs. 212 +/- 14 ms, p = 0.004); longer conduction time along linear catheters (57 +/- 18 ms vs. 47 +/- 10 ms, p = 0.01); longer bi-atrial activation time (128 +/- 17 ms vs. 89 +/- 10 ms, p < 0.001); slower conduction velocity (RA: 1.3 +/- 0.3 mm/ms vs. 2.1 +/- 0.5 mm/ms; LA: 1.2 +/- 0.2 mm/ms vs. 2.2 +/- 0.4 mm/ms, p < 0.001); greater proportion of fractionated electrograms (27 +/- 8% vs. 8 +/- 5%, p < 0.001); longer corrected sinus node recovery time (265 +/- 57 ms vs. 185 +/- 60 ms, p = 0.002); and lower voltage (RA: 1.7 +/- 0.4 mV vs. 2.9 +/- 0.4 mV; LA: 1.7 +/- 0.7 mV vs. 3.3 +/- 0.7 mV, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with paroxysmal lone AF, remote from arrhythmia, demonstrate bi-atrial abnormalities characterized by structural change, conduction abnormalities, and sinus node dysfunction. These factors are likely contributors to the "second factor" that predisposes to the development and progression of AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stiles et al. (2009) conducted a case-control in Paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation (n=50). Paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation vs. Reference patients with left-sided accessory pathways was evaluated on Right atrial volume (p=0.003). Patients with paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation demonstrated abnormal atrial substrate, including larger right atrial volumes (94 vs 69 ml, p=0.003) and longer effective refractory periods compared to reference patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: