Key result
Sarcopenia is not linked to increased major morbidity or mortality in minimally invasive mitral surgery.
Why the study?
The use of psoas muscle size as a marker of frailty and its impact on surgical risk in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery was lacking.
Does sarcopenia increase operative morbidity or mortality in patients undergoing isolated minimally invasive mitral valve surgery?
Cohort (n=192)
Does sarcopenia increase operative morbidity or mortality in patients undergoing isolated minimally invasive mitral valve surgery?
Sarcopenia, as measured by psoas muscle index, does not significantly increase perioperative morbidity or mortality in patients undergoing isolated minimally invasive mitral valve surgery, suggesting this approach is safe for frail patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Psoas index may flag readmission risk after minimally invasive mitral surgery; leaves open whether frailty assessment should guide patient selection or approach.
Objective: Psoas muscle size is a reliable marker of sarcopenia and frailty that correlates with adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. However, its use in mitral and minimally invasive cardiac surgery is lacking. We sought to determine whether frailty, as measured by psoas muscle index, increases surgical risk for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Methods: Patients undergoing isolated minimally invasive mitral surgery via right minithoracotomy were identified. Patients who underwent maze, tricuspid intervention, and those who were emergent were excluded. Total psoas muscle area was calculated using the average cross-sectional area at the L3 vertebra on computed tomography scan and indexed to body surface area. Sarcopenia was defined as <25th gender-specific percentile. Patients were stratified by sarcopenia status and outcomes compared. Results: Of 287 total patients, 192 patients met inclusion criteria. Sarcopenic patients were 6 years older (66 vs 60 years, P = 0.01), had lower preoperative albumin levels (4.0 vs 4.3 g/dL, P < 0.001), and had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk of morbidity/mortality (13.1% vs 9.0%, P = 0.003). Operative major morbidity or mortality was 6.4% versus 5.5% ( P = 0.824), while the 1-year mortality rate was 2.1% versus 0% ( P = 0.08). After risk adjustment, psoas index did not predict operative morbidity or mortality. However, sarcopenia was associated with higher odds of readmission (odds ratio = 0.74, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Contrary to other cardiac operations, for patients undergoing isolated minimally invasive mitral valve surgery, sarcopenia was not associated with increased perioperative risk except for higher readmission rates. Minimally invasive surgical approaches should be strongly considered as the approach of choice in frail patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wisniewski et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (n=192). Sarcopenia (psoas muscle index <25th percentile) vs. Non-sarcopenic patients was evaluated on Operative major morbidity or mortality (p=0.824). Sarcopenia was not associated with increased operative major morbidity or mortality in patients undergoing isolated minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: