Key result
Preprocedure review of CTA coronary venous anatomy significantly decreased procedure times and utilization of contrast, fluoroscopy, and guide catheters during CRT procedures.
Why the study?
The ability of cardiovascular computed tomographic angiography to facilitate cardiac resynchronization therapy procedures was assessed in a prospective randomized study.
Does preprocedure review of CTA coronary venous anatomy reduce procedure times and resource utilization in patients undergoing CRT?
RCT (n=26)
randomized
No
Does preprocedure review of CTA coronary venous anatomy reduce procedure times and resource utilization in patients undergoing CRT?
Preprocedural review of coronary venous anatomy using CTA significantly reduces procedure time and resource utilization during CRT implantation.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular computed tomographic angiography (CTA) can visualize the coronary veins. We sought to assess the ability of CTA to facilitate resynchronization therapy (CRT) procedures using a prospective randomized single-center pilot study. METHODS: Patients underwent CTA for characterization of cardiomyopathy prior to biventricular implantable cardiac-defibrillator implant. Randomization was performed with operator review of the CTA for coronary venous anatomy prior to CRT in one-half of the cases. Invasive coronary venous angiograms were used in all procedures. Analysis included procedure times and utilization of contrast, fluoroscopy, and guide catheters. RESULTS: Characteristics of the 26 patients enrolled were mean age 55 ± 11 years, male 76.9%, ischemic etiology 35%, ejection fraction 25 ± 3%, class III congestive heart failure 100%, and QRS duration 179 ± 29 ms. Of patients enrolled, 22 had both CTA and procedure initiation. Three patients (two with CTA review and one without CTA review) had aborted procedures due to hemodynamic issues. Analysis of the 22 patients (nine with preprocedure CTA review and 13 without CTA review) demonstrated that preprocedure review of CTA coronary venous anatomy led to significantly decreased procedure times and utilization of contrast, fluoroscopy, and guide catheters. CONCLUSIONS: Preprocedure review of CTA coronary venous anatomy may lead to decreased procedural times and utilization of contrast, fluoroscopy, and guide catheters. These preliminary results will need to be evaluated in larger heart failure populations undergoing CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Girsky et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in Heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=26). Preprocedure review of CTA coronary venous anatomy vs. No preprocedure CTA review was evaluated on Procedure times and utilization of contrast, fluoroscopy, and guide catheters. Preprocedure review of CTA coronary venous anatomy significantly decreased procedure times and utilization of contrast, fluoroscopy, and guide catheters during CRT procedures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: