Key result
CK-MB mass outperforms CK-B activity for MI detection, with macro CK interference in ~24%.
Why the study?
The diagnostic value of CK-MB mass concentration compared with CK-B activity in patients with suspected AMI and slightly elevated total serum CK activity was unclear.
Does CK-MB mass concentration improve the diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction compared to CK-B activity in patients with slightly elevated total CK?
Observational (n=33)
Does CK-MB mass concentration improve the diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction compared to CK-B activity in patients with slightly elevated total CK?
CK-MB mass concentration is a more accurate diagnostic marker than CK-B activity for acute myocardial infarction in patients with only slightly elevated total CK, as CK-B assays are prone to interference from macro CK.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CK-B activity risks AMI misclassification in mild CK elevations; leaves open whether CK-MB mass should supplant it in diagnostics.
OBJECTIVE: The diagnostic value of creatine kinase-MB mass concentration (CK-MB mass) was compared with that of creatine kinase-B (CK-B) activity in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) but with total serum CK activity only slightly above the reference range. DESIGN: One hundred consecutive blood samples with total CK activity between 120 and 360 U l-1 and CK-B activity > or = 9 U l-1 were analysed. Electrophoresis of CK isoenzymes was also performed. SETTING: Patients from all departments of the hospital were included. About half of the patients originated from the coronary care unit. SUBJECTS: The blood samples derived from 49 patients. Thirteen patients had at least one serum sample with total CK activity above 360 U l-1. These and another three patients were omitted from the study. RESULTS: Acute myocardial infarction had been diagnosed clinically (with CK and CK-B methods) in 12 of 33 patients. However, using the CK-MB mass concentration of the reference method, five of these 12 patients did not have myocardial infarction whereas nine patients with small infarctions were undetected. A good correlation was seen between the results from CK-MB mass concentration and CK isoenzyme electrophoresis, but there was a poor correlation between these methods and CK-B activity including the CK-B/CK ratio. A relatively high proportion (24%) of the selected patients had increased levels of macro CK. CONCLUSION: CK-B activity was inaccurate for the detection of probably myocardial infarction in patients with slightly elevated total CK activity. Increased levels of macro CK interfering with the CK-B assay was one explanation for this observation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hulting et al. (1994) conducted an observational in Suspected acute myocardial infarction with slightly elevated total serum CK activity (n=33). Creatine kinase-MB mass concentration vs. Creatine kinase-B activity was evaluated on Detection of acute myocardial infarction. In patients with slightly elevated total CK activity, CK-B activity was inaccurate for detecting myocardial infarction compared to CK-MB mass concentration, with 24% having interfering macro CK.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: