Key result
Systematic review evaluates interventions to improve patient adherence to heart failure guideline recommendations.
Why the study?
Poor adherence to guideline recommendations in secondary and tertiary prevention of heart failure is a critical barrier to treatment success, necessitating evaluation of interventions to improve adherence.
Do interventions to enhance adherence improve patient adherence to guideline recommendations in patients with heart failure?
Systematic Review
Do interventions to enhance adherence improve patient adherence to guideline recommendations in patients with heart failure?
This systematic review protocol outlines a plan to evaluate the efficacy of various interventions aimed at improving patient adherence to heart failure guideline recommendations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Protocol for systematic review of HF adherence interventions; leaves open optimal strategies to boost guideline-directed secondary prevention.
Background: Heart Failure (HF) is a major clinical and public health problem with strong implications for quality of life and high socioeconomic impact due to costs of treatment. Patients being treated according to the present recommendations show improved survival and lower rehospitalization rates, but poor adherence is considered to be a critical barrier for treatment success. Therefore, we want to investigate interventions aimed at improving adherence of patients to recommendations on HF, e.g. how do physicians approach their patients’ problems, provide information and involve individual values and preferences in the process of decision making? To date, many randomized trials have investigated interventions to reduce barriers for adherence, but a systematic review of these interventions is needed. Methods: This systematic review should evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of interventions to enhance patient adherence to guideline recommendations in secondary and tertiary prevention of HF. Methodology follows the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We will include only randomized controlled trials and classify interventions according to their active component as interventions concerning the provider, patient education, and patient reminder, promotion of patients’ self-management, organizational change or technical solutions. The primary outcome measure is patient adherence; important patient outcomes such as quality of life, mortality, morbidity, hospital admissions and readmissions, days in hospital, and costs are added as secondary outcomes. A random-effects meta-regression model will be used to simultaneously assess the influence of different strategies on patient adherence. Analyses on heterogeneity will include pre-defined methodological and clinical sources of heterogeneity. Conclusion: This systematic review should identify major components of successful interventions aimed to foster the therapeutic adherence and/or self-managing abilities of patients. Without appropriate strategies for promoting adherence the transfer of guideline recommendations into daily practice is hindered by many obstacles that reduce the desired health outcome. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42014009477.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2014 study conducted a systematic review in Heart Failure. Interventions to enhance patient adherence was evaluated on Patient adherence. This systematic review protocol outlines a planned evaluation of interventions to enhance patient adherence to guideline recommendations in secondary and tertiary prevention of heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: