Key result
The tetravalent rhesus rotavirus vaccine reduced the incidence of rotavirus gastroenteritis over two seasons with a relative efficacy of 57% (98.3% CI 29-74%).
Why the study?
Does rhesus rotavirus monovalent or tetravalent reassortant vaccine reduce the incidence of rotavirus gastroenteritis in healthy infants?
Population
1006 healthy infants between 4 and 26 weeks of age in the United States
Comparison
Rhesus rotavirus monovalent or tetravalent… vs Placebo (three doses)
Design
RCT, double-masked
Follow-up
two rotavirus seasons (2 years)
Authors
Loading...
Supports routine infant vaccination; confirms benefit of tetravalent rhesus rotavirus vaccine over two seasons.
RCT (n=1,006)
Double-blind
Yes
Does rhesus rotavirus monovalent or tetravalent reassortant vaccine reduce the incidence of rotavirus gastroenteritis in healthy infants?
Effect estimate: Relative efficacy 57% (tetravalent) (95% CI 29% to 74%)
Both monovalent and tetravalent rhesus rotavirus vaccines safely reduced the incidence of rotavirus gastroenteritis in infants, with the tetravalent vaccine providing broader protection against non-serotype 1 strains in the second year.
David I. Bernstein (1995) conducted an RCT in Rotavirus gastroenteritis (n=1,006). Rhesus rotavirus monovalent and tetravalent reassortant vaccines vs. Placebo was evaluated on Incidence of rotavirus gastroenteritis after three doses over two rotavirus seasons (Relative efficacy 57% (tetravalent), 95% CI 29% to 74%). The tetravalent rhesus rotavirus vaccine reduced the incidence of rotavirus gastroenteritis over two seasons with a relative efficacy of 57% (98.3% CI 29-74%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: