Key result
TAVI is linked to lower bacterial translocation and inflammation vs. OHAVR despite more vascular complications.
Why the study?
The safety profile of transarterial aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may be related to lower systemic bacterial translocation and inflammation compared with open-heart surgery, but this relationship was not established.
Does TAVI reduce systemic bacterial translocation and inflammation compared to OHAVR in patients with aortic stenosis?
Case-Control (n=52)
No
Does TAVI reduce systemic bacterial translocation and inflammation compared to OHAVR in patients with aortic stenosis?
TAVI is associated with decreased bacterial translocation and systemic inflammation compared to open-heart surgery, which may contribute to better hemodynamic stability and lower delirium rates.
TAVI-associated reductions in translocation warrant no practice change; leaves open net clinical benefit in randomized trials balancing vascular risks.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the good safety profile of transarterial aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is related to lower levels of systemic bacterial translocation and systemic inflammation compared with open-heart surgery. BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation via the transfemoral approach is increasingly used in very high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. The outcomes seem similar to those after open-heart aortic valve replacement (OHAVR). METHODS: Each of 26 consecutive high-risk patients (EuroSCORE >20% for risk of operative death) who underwent TAVI (cases) was matched to the first low-risk patient treated next in our department using elective OHAVR without coronary artery bypass (control subjects). We collected severity, outcome, and echocardiography indicators before and after surgery; complications; proinflammatory cytokine levels; and markers for microbial translocation. RESULTS: Despite greater illness severity, the TAVI patients had significantly lower vasopressor agent requirements, lower delirium rates, shorter hospital stays, and better hemodynamic findings compared with OHAVR patients. Vascular complications were more common after TAVI than after OHAVR (12, with seven requiring interventional therapy vs. 0, P = 0.006). Patients who underwent TAVI had lower blood transfusion requirements. Two TAVI patients died: one from iliac artery injury and the other from intracardiac prosthesis migration. Patients who underwent TAVI had lower plasma levels of endotoxin and bacterial peptidoglycan, as well as lower proinflammatory cytokine levels, suggesting less gastrointestinal bacterial translocation compared with OHAVR. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with OHAVR, TAVI was associated with decreases in bacterial translocation and inflammation. These differences may explain the lower delirium rate and better hemodynamic stability observed, despite the greater disease severity in TAVI patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adrie et al. (2014) conducted a case-control in Aortic stenosis (n=52). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. Open-heart aortic valve replacement (OHAVR) was evaluated on Systemic bacterial translocation and systemic inflammation. TAVI was associated with decreased bacterial translocation and inflammation compared with OHAVR, although vascular complications were more common (12 vs 0; P=0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: