Key result
Secretoneurin shows low within-subject biological variation of ~10%, supporting biomarker suitability.
Why the study?
Secretoneurin is a novel prognostic biomarker implicated in mortality prediction in heart failure and ventricular arrhythmias, but its biological variation parameters are not established.
Observational (n=30)
Secretoneurin has low biological variation and index of individuality, suggesting delta values in serial sampling may be preferable for identifying clinical changes.
Supports serial testing feasibility; leaves open added prognostic value in cardiovascular cohorts.
Secretoneurin is a novel prognostic biomarker that may predict mortality in heart failure and the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias. This study reports the within subject variation (CVI), between subject variation (CVG), reference change values (RCV) and index of individuality (II) of secretoneurin. Thirty healthy volunteers were included. Non-fasting samples were obtained between 8 and 10 am once a week for ten weeks. Secretoneurin was analyzed in duplicate using ELISA. No outliers were present according to Burnett and Reeds‘ criteria. Simple linear regression did not identify significant trends. Variance homogeneity in the analytical variance and CVI were tested using Cochrane’s and Bartlett’s tests and four participants were excluded. Calculation of CVI, CVG and RCV were done on ln transformed data as described by Fokkema, the II was calculated using retransformed data. The median age of the participants was 36 years and 53% were female. Non-fasting glucose, eGFR(CKD-EPI), cTnT and NT-proBNP concentrations were within the normal range. Median secretoneurin concentrations were 38 pmol/L (women) and 33 pmol/L (men), p-value < 0.001. CVI and CVG were 9.8% (CI 8.7% to 11.0%) and 20.0 (CI 15.4% to 28.0%), respectively. RCV were 38.7% (CI 35.5% to 42.7%) and −27.9 (CI −29.9 to −26.2) and the II were 0.60 (CI 0.42–0.78). No gender differences were present. Secretoneurin has a fairly low CVI, CVG, RCV and II, indicating that it could be suitable as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker and that delta values in serial samplings may be preferable for identifying clinical changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aakre et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=30). Secretoneurin was evaluated on Within subject variation (CVI), between subject variation (CVG), reference change values (RCV) and index of individuality (II). Secretoneurin demonstrated a low within-subject variation of 9.8% (95% CI 8.7-11.0%) and between-subject variation of 20.0%, suggesting its suitability as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: