Key result
A patient with nicorandil-induced ulcerations had abnormally high amounts of nicotinic acid (×38) and nicotinamide (×11) in the ulcerated area compared to a non-exposed control patient.
Why the study?
Does nicorandil exposure lead to abnormal accumulation of nicotinic acid and nicotinamide in ulcerated areas compared to non-exposure?
Case Report (n=2)
Does nicorandil exposure lead to abnormal accumulation of nicotinic acid and nicotinamide in ulcerated areas compared to non-exposure?
Effect estimate: ×38 for nicotinic acid and ×11 for nicotinamide
Nicorandil-induced ulcerations are associated with abnormally high local concentrations of its metabolites, nicotinic acid and nicotinamide, highlighting the need to carefully weigh the drug's risk-benefit ratio.
Supports metabolite accumulation hypothesis in nicorandil ulcers; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Nicorandil, a nicotinamide ester, was first reported to be involved in the induction of oral ulcers in 1997. Since then, many reports of single or multiple nicorandil-induced ulcerations (NIUs) have been reported. We hypothesised that in the case of high-dosage nicorandil or after an increased dosage of nicorandil, nicotinic acid and nicotinamide (two main metabolites of nicorandil) cannot appropriately merge into the endogenous pool of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide/phosphate, which leads to abnormal distribution of these metabolites in the body. In recent or maintained trauma, nicotinamide increases blood flow at the edge of the raw area, inducing epithelial proliferation, while nicotinic acid ulcerates this epithelial formation, ultimately flooding the entire scar. We demonstrate, by comparison to a control patient non-exposed to nicorandil, an abnormal amount of nicotinic acid (×38) and nicotinamide (×11) in the ulcerated area in a patient with NIUs. All practitioners, especially geriatricians, dermatologists and surgeons, must be aware of these serious and insidious side effects of nicorandil. It is critical to rapidly reassess the risk-benefit ratio of this drug for any patient, and not only for those with diverticular diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tréchot et al. (2013) conducted a case report in Nicorandil-induced ulcerations (n=2). Nicorandil vs. Non-exposed control patient was evaluated on Amount of nicotinic acid and nicotinamide in the ulcerated area (×38 for nicotinic acid and ×11 for nicotinamide). A patient with nicorandil-induced ulcerations had abnormally high amounts of nicotinic acid (×38) and nicotinamide (×11) in the ulcerated area compared to a non-exposed control patient.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: