Key result
Comprehensive review details evolving diagnostic and management strategies for acute coronary syndrome.
Why the study?
The management of patients with suspected or confirmed ACS continues to evolve as new evidence and technology become available to clinicians.
Provides a concise review of the pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, and management of acute coronary syndrome based on evidence available in 2008.
Accurate ACS diagnosis has life-saving implications; leaves open refinements to biomarker thresholds in contemporary practice.
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) refers to a group of clinical conditions caused by myocardial ischemia including unstable angina, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Appropriate and accurate diagnosis has life-saving implications and requires a quick but thorough evaluation of the patient's history, physical examination, electrocardiogram, radiographic studies, and cardiac biomarkers. The management of patients with suspected or confirmed ACS continues to evolve as new evidence from clinical trials is considered and as new technology becomes available to both primary care physicians and cardiologists. Low- and intermediate-risk patients have frequently been managed in a chest pain center or in the emergency department. While stress testing with or without radionuclide imaging is the most common evaluation method, a CT angiogram is sometimes substituted. High-risk patients are often managed with an early invasive strategy involving left heart catheterization with a goal of prompt revascularization of at-risk, viable myocardium. With the increased availability of cardiac catheterization facilities, patients with STEMI are more commonly being managed with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, although thrombolysis is still used where such facilities are not immediately available. This article provides primary care physicians with a concise review of the pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, and management of ACS based on the best available evidence in 2008.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalra et al. (2008) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndrome. This review outlines the pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, and evolving management strategies for acute coronary syndrome based on 2008 evidence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: