Key result
Heart failure is linked to a ~5-fold increase in LV asynchrony versus healthy controls.
Why the study?
Recent technical developments with high-resolution real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography have facilitated analysis of segmental volume-time curves, but its clinical utility for assessing LV asynchrony compared to tissue Doppler imaging was unclear.
Does real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) accurately assess left ventricular asynchrony compared to tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) in patients with heart failure?
Observational (n=39)
No
Does real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) accurately assess left ventricular asynchrony compared to tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) in patients with heart failure?
RT3DE analysis of volume-time curves is a useful clinical parameter for evaluating LV function and asynchrony in patients with heart failure, correlating well with tissue Doppler imaging.
RT3DE detects higher LV asynchrony in HF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice versus TDI.
Background and Objectives:Recent technical developments with high-resolution real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) have facilitated the acquisition of high quality images and the analysis of segmental volumetime curves (VTCs). The purposes of this study were to assess left ventricular (LV) asynchrony with using the VTCs of 16 segments by RT3DE and to compare this with tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) as a clinical parameter. Subjects and Methods:Twenty-three heart failure (HF) patients (LVEF: 25±6%, age: 60±13 years) and 16 normal controls underwent TDI and RT3DE at baseline and 1-year. The standard deviation (SD3) of the end systolic time to reach the minimal systolic volume for the 16 segments on VTCs was obtained by RT3DE. The standard deviation (SD2) of the electromechanical coupling time for the 8 segments was measured using TDI. Results: SD3 was markedly higher in the HF patients than that in the controls (7.7±2.5 vs 1.5±1.0%, respectively, p< 0.01) and it increased as the LVEF decreased (r=-0.85, p<0.01). SD2 was also significantly higher in the HF patients (27.0±8.6 vs 12.6±5.0 msec, respectively, p<0.01) and it had good negative correlation with the LVEF (r=-0.72, p<0.01). SD3 was well correlated with SD2 (r=0.66, p<0.01). At 1-year, the HF patients with an increased LVEF showed a decreased SD3 (7/13). In contrast, the patients with a decreased LVEF had an increased SD3 (3/13). Conclusion:The analysis of VTCs for the 16 LV segments with using RT3DE from a single acoustic window may be a useful clinical parameter for evaluating the LV function, including LV asynchrony, the LV volume and the LVEF. (Korean Circulation J 2006;36:669-675)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Heart Failure (n=39). Heart failure vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Standard deviation of the corrected end systolic time for 16 segments (SD3) by real-time 3D echocardiography (p=<0.01). Heart failure patients exhibited significantly higher left ventricular asynchrony compared to healthy controls, as measured by the standard deviation of corrected end systolic time (7.7% vs 1.5%, p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: