Key result
Second-generation DES linked to ~72% lower 2-year MACE vs. first-generation stents in diabetes.
Why the study?
Differences in clinical outcomes between first-generation and second-generation drug-eluting stents in type 2 diabetic patients have yet to be evaluated.
Does second-generation DES implantation reduce MACEs compared to first-generation DES in type 2 diabetic patients?
Cohort (n=993)
No
Does second-generation DES implantation reduce MACEs compared to first-generation DES in type 2 diabetic patients?
Hazard Ratio: 3.6 (95% CI 2.03–6.37)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.3% vs 10%
p-value: p=<0.001
Second-generation drug-eluting stents significantly reduce the risk of major adverse cardiac events compared to first-generation stents in patients with type 2 diabetes, primarily driven by lower revascularization rates.
May support preferring second-generation DES in type 2 diabetes; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation has significantly reduced the risk of restenosis and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates compared with bare-metal stents in type 2 diabetic patients. Differences in outcomes between the first-generation and second-generation DESs in diabetic patients, however, have yet to be evaluated. AIM: We compared MACEs after second-generation DES implantation compared with those of first-generation stents in diabetic patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-center prospective cohort study compared first-generation DES (n=654) and second-generation DES (n=339) implantation in type 2 diabetic patients by propensity score matching. The primary outcome was the occurrence of MACEs, defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. The rate of MACEs was lower in the second-generation DES group after 2 years of follow-up (3.3 vs. 10.0%, P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed higher MACE-free survival in diabetic patients in the second-generation DES group (log-rank P<0.001). In a Cox regression analysis, first-generation DES (hazard ratio=3.60, 95% confidence interval, 2.03-6.37, P<0.001) was an independent predictor for MACEs. CONCLUSION: In type 2 diabetic patients, second-generation DES implantation resulted in lower MACEs compared with first-generation DESs, primarily because of lower target lesion and vessel revascularization rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeong et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes (n=993). Second-generation drug-eluting stent vs. First-generation drug-eluting stent was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) (HR 3.60, 95% CI 2.03-6.37, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: