Key result
Antithrombin concentrate increases immediate therapeutic ACT achievement to 96% vs heparin in heparin resistance.
Why the study?
Heparin resistance is an important clinical problem traditionally treated with additional heparin or fresh frozen plasma, but the effectiveness of antithrombin concentrate for this condition was uncertain.
Does antithrombin concentrate improve the achievement of a therapeutic activated clotting time in patients with heparin resistance requiring cardiopulmonary bypass?
Comparison
1000 U antithrombin concentrate vs additional heparin
Design
Randomized clinical trial
Authors
Loading...
AT concentrate achieves therapeutic ACT more reliably and rapidly than additional heparin in heparin-resistant CPB patients; supports targeted AT replacement in this setting.
RCT (n=85)
Does antithrombin concentrate improve the achievement of a therapeutic activated clotting time in patients with heparin resistance requiring cardiopulmonary bypass?
Absolute Event Rate: 96% vs 68%
p-value: p=0.001
Antithrombin concentrate is more effective and faster than additional heparin for achieving adequate anticoagulation in patients with heparin resistance during cardiopulmonary bypass.
Williams et al. (2000) conducted an RCT in Heparin resistance (n=85). Antithrombin (AT) concentrate vs. Additional heparin was evaluated on Immediately obtaining a therapeutic activated clotting time (p=0.001). Antithrombin concentrate was more effective than additional heparin for immediately obtaining a therapeutic activated clotting time in heparin-resistant patients (96% vs 68%, p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: