Key result
Lower heart rate variability fails to correlate with psychosocial outcomes in young cancer patients.
Why the study?
Heart rate variability is a valid biomarker of stress, but its associations with psychosocial outcomes in adolescents and young adults with cancer are not well understood.
Is heart rate variability associated with psychosocial patient-reported outcomes in adolescents and young adults with cancer?
Cross-Sectional (n=76)
No
Is heart rate variability associated with psychosocial patient-reported outcomes in adolescents and young adults with cancer?
In adolescents and young adults with cancer, heart rate variability is significantly lower than in healthy peers but does not correlate with psychosocial patient-reported outcomes.
HRV should not yet inform psychosocial evaluation in AYA cancer; leaves open its role in prospective autonomic studies.
BACKGROUND: Heart Rate Variability (HRV) is a valid, scalable biomarker of stress. We aimed to examine associations between HRV and psychosocial outcomes in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of baseline data from a randomized trial testing a resilience intervention in AYAs with cancer. Two widely used HRV metrics, the standard deviation of normal to normal beats (SDNN) and root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), were derived from electrocardiograms. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) survey measures included quality of life, anxiety, depression, distress, and resilience. Linear regression models were used to test associations between HRV and PRO scores. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to test differences in median HRV values among participant subgroups. RESULTS: Among the n = 76 patients with available electrocardiograms, the mean age was 16 years (SD 3y), 63% were white, and leukemia/lymphoma was the most common diagnosis. Compared to healthy adolescents, AYAs with cancer had lower median HRV (SDNN [Females: 31.9 (12.8-50.7) vs 66.4 (46.0-86.8), p<0.01; Males: 29.9 (11.5-47.9) vs 63.2 (48.4-84.6), p<0.01]; RMSSD [Females: 28.2 (11.1-45.5) vs 69.0 (49.1-99.6), p<0.01; Males: 27.9 (8.6-48.6) vs 58.7 (44.8-88.2), p<0.01]). There was no statistically significant association between PRO measures and SDNN or RMSSD in either an unadjusted or adjusted linear regression models. CONCLUSION: In this secondary analysis, we did not find an association between HRV and psychosocial PROs among AYAs with cancer. HRV measures were lower than for healthy adolescents. Larger prospective studies in AYA biopsychosocial research are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Cancer in adolescents and young adults (n=76). Heart rate variability (HRV) was evaluated on Association between HRV (SDNN and RMSSD) and psychosocial patient-reported outcomes (anxiety, depression, distress, quality of life, resilience). Among 76 adolescents and young adults with cancer, there was no statistically significant association between heart rate variability and psychosocial patient-reported outcomes, although HRV was significantly lower than in healthy adolescents.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: