Key result
Female sex is linked to ~35% higher 2-year post-PCI bleeding risk in older patients.
Why the study?
Differences in outcomes for women and men after PCI in older patients remain controversial.
Does female sex increase the risk of bleeding and adverse events in older patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to male sex?
Cohort (n=4,926)
No
Does female sex increase the risk of bleeding and adverse events in older patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to male sex?
Hazard Ratio: 1.35 (95% CI 1.06–1.71)
Absolute Event Rate: 9.2% vs 6.2%
p-value: p=0.014
Older women undergoing PCI have a significantly higher risk of long-term bleeding compared to men, highlighting the need for sex-specific bleeding mitigation strategies.
May warrant closer bleeding surveillance in older women after PCI; leaves open whether sex-specific strategies improve outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: Differences in outcomes for women and men after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in older patients remain controversial. Herein, we compared 2-year outcomes by sex in Chinese older patients undergoing PCI. METHODS: A total of 4926 consecutive patients (33.6% women, age ≥60 years, mean age 67.4 ± 5.7 years) who underwent PCI at a single center in China from January 2013 to December 2013 were included in this study. The primary endpoint was 2-year risk of bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definitions. The secondary endpoints included 2-year risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Hazard ratios were generated using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Compared with men, women had significantly higher rates of in-hospital all-cause mortality (0.8% vs 0.2%, P = 0.001), cardiac death (0.5% vs 0.1%, P = 0.006), MACCE (2.4% vs 1.5%, P = 0.017), and bleeding (0.4% vs 0.1%, P = 0.015). At 2-year follow up, there were no differences between men and women for all-cause mortality (1.9% vs 1.8%, P = 0.839) and 2-year MACCE (13.1% vs 11.8%, P = 0.216). However, women had a higher risk of 2-year bleeding (9.2% vs 6.2%, P < 0.001), which persisted after adjusting for baseline differences and treatment characteristics (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.71; P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: We found that older women undergoing PCI were at increased risk of 2-year bleeding compared with men. Further dedicated studies are needed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease (n=4,926). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on 2-year risk of bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definitions (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.06-1.71, p=0.014). Older women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention had a significantly higher risk of 2-year bleeding compared with men (9.2% vs 6.2%; adjusted HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.06-1.71; P=0.014).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: