Key result
Structured transfer-workflow optimization is linked to a ~50-minute reduction in DIDO time for STEMI patients.
Why the study?
Does a structured transfer-workflow optimization program reduce door-in-door-out time in transferred STEMI patients?
Observational (n=785)
Yes
Does a structured transfer-workflow optimization program reduce door-in-door-out time in transferred STEMI patients?
Mean Difference: -49.7
p-value: p=0.009
A structured transfer-workflow optimization program significantly reduced door-in-door-out and first medical contact-to-wire crossing times for STEMI patients requiring inter-hospital transfer for primary PCI.
Background Inter-hospital transfer delays remain a major barrier to timely primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We evaluated a structured transfer-workflow optimization program in a regional hub-and-spoke chest pain center network. Methods This retrospective interrupted time series study included 785 transferred STEMI patients recorded in the National Chest Pain Center Reporting Platform within the Hanzhong Central Hospital regional network, China, from November 2019 to September 2025. A hub-led workflow intervention began in February 2022 and targeted reception, triage, STEMI recognition, internal pathways, and earlier hub notification at spoke hospitals. The primary endpoint was monthly mean door-in–door-out (DIDO) time; secondary endpoints were first medical contact–to–wire crossing (FMC2W) and in-hospital outcomes. Segmented regression was complemented by autocorrelation diagnostics, sensitivity models, spectral analyses, and negative-control analyses. Results The intervention was associated with an immediate DIDO reduction of 49.7 min ( P = 0.009), with consistent autocorrelation-robust estimates. Shorter DIDO was associated with shorter FMC2W, whereas non-targeted downstream intervals remained stable. Spectral analyses supported reduced high-frequency variability. Crude rates of composite complications and new-onset in-hospital heart failure were lower after intervention, but model-based effects at 12 and 24 months were not significant. These were fitted-model estimates, not patient-level follow-up; clinical endpoints were exploratory. Conclusions Structured transfer-workflow optimization was associated with reduced DIDO time and shorter FMC2W. Clinical outcome findings were exploratory and did not establish long-term benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) conducted an observational in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=785). Structured transfer-workflow optimization program vs. Pre-intervention period was evaluated on monthly mean door-in-door-out (DIDO) time (reduction of 49.7 min, p=0.009). A structured transfer-workflow optimization program was associated with an immediate reduction in mean door-in-door-out time of 49.7 minutes (P=0.009) among transferred STEMI patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: