Key result
Six-month exercise training improves exercise capacity regardless of LVEF, with noncardiac factors explaining ~50% of peak VO2.
Why the study?
Systolic left ventricular dysfunction is a weak predictor of exercise tolerance in patients with chronic congestive heart failure, necessitating identification of other predictors in coronary artery disease patients.
Does a medically supervised exercise training program improve exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease regardless of their degree of left ventricular dysfunction?
Comparison
Effort tolerance and adaptability to training across different levels of left ventricular dysfunction
Design
Cohort study of medically supervised exercise training program
Follow-up
6 months
Authors
Loading...
Noncardiac factors may limit exercise capacity in HF; leaves open optimal integration of exercise training into care pathways.
Cohort (n=171)
Does a medically supervised exercise training program improve exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease regardless of their degree of left ventricular dysfunction?
Noncardiac factors are better predictors of effort tolerance than left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease, and patients derive similar benefits from exercise training regardless of their degree of LV dysfunction.
DIGENIO et al. (1997) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease (n=171). Medically supervised exercise training program was evaluated on Peak oxygen uptake, ventilatory threshold, and treadmill time to exhaustion. Noncardiac factors explained 50% of the variation in peak oxygen uptake, and a 6-month exercise program significantly improved exercise capacity regardless of left ventricular dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: