Key result
DCB-only PCI matches DES for clinical outcomes and outperforms plain balloon angioplasty angiographically.
Why the study?
There is a need for further long-term randomized controlled trial data comparing drug-coated balloon-only PCI specifically against second- or third-generation drug-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery disease.
Does drug-coated balloon-only percutaneous coronary intervention improve clinical and angiographic outcomes compared to drug-eluting stents or plain balloon angioplasty in patients with de novo coronary artery disease?
Systematic Review (n=6,586)
Does drug-coated balloon-only percutaneous coronary intervention improve clinical and angiographic outcomes compared to drug-eluting stents or plain balloon angioplasty in patients with de novo coronary artery disease?
DCB-only PCI offers comparable clinical outcomes to DES and superior angiographic outcomes to plain balloon angioplasty for de novo coronary artery disease, with the advantage of requiring only 4 weeks of dual antiplatelet therapy.
May support DCB-only PCI as stent-free alternative; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of durability.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug coated balloon (DCB) is a novel treatment which seeks to acutely dilate a coronary stenosis and deliver an anti-proliferative drug to the vessel wall (reducing the risk of re-stenosis), without implanting a drug eluting stent (DES). In this study, we performed a systematic review of stentless DCB-only angioplasty in de novo coronary artery disease. We identified 41 studies examining the effects of DCB-only PCI in a variety of clinical scenarios including small vessels, bifurcations, calcified lesions, and primary PCI. DCB-only PCI appears to be associated with comparable clinical outcomes to DESs and superior angiographic outcomes to plain-old balloon angioplasty. Although current data are promising, there is still a need for further long-term randomized control trial data comparing a DCB-only approach specifically against a second- or third-generation DES. A 4-week period of dual antiplatelet therapy provides a real advantage for the DCB-only PCI approach, which is not possible with most DESs. Since rates of adverse clinical outcomes are very low for all PCI procedures attention should be turned to the development of robust endpoints with which to compare DCB-only PCI approaches to the standard treatment with a DES.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohiaddin et al. (2018) conducted a systematic review in De novo coronary artery disease (n=6,586). Drug-coated balloon-only percutaneous coronary intervention vs. Drug-eluting stents or plain-old balloon angioplasty was evaluated on Clinical outcomes (MACE, TLR) and angiographic outcomes (late luminal loss). Drug-coated balloon-only percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with comparable clinical outcomes to drug-eluting stents and superior angiographic outcomes to plain-old balloon angioplasty.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: