Key result
Proteomic and phosphoproteomic profiling identifies two advanced HF subgroups with divergent remodeling and survival trajectories.
Why the study?
Molecular heterogeneity in heart failure is a major barrier to effective therapy development, necessitating molecular classification of patients.
Population
149 patients with advanced heart failure spanning nine clinical etiologies
Comparison
Proteome-based clustering into molecular subgroups with divergent remodeling phenotypes
Design
Proteomic and phosphoproteomic profiling observational study
Authors
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“This study delivers new insights into the field, demonstrating the power of a combined proteomic and phosphoproteomic technique to further elucidate how protein signaling pathways change in complex diseases.”
Proteomic and phosphoproteomic profiling of advanced heart failure tissues identifies two distinct molecular subgroups that predict survival trajectories, providing a framework for precision-guided therapies.
Observational (n=149)
Proteomic and phosphoproteomic profiling of advanced heart failure tissues identifies two distinct molecular subgroups that predict survival trajectories, providing a framework for precision-guided therapies.
Hamed et al. (2026) conducted an observational in advanced heart failure (n=149). Proteomic and phosphoproteomic profiling was evaluated on Molecular subgroups and survival trajectories. Proteomic and phosphoproteomic profiling stratified patients with advanced heart failure into two molecular subgroups characterized by divergent remodeling phenotypes and predicted survival trajectories.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: