Key result
Low right atrial septal pacing is linked to ~85% lower ventricular pacing versus appendage pacing.
Why the study?
Unnecessary ventricular pacing in sinus node disease must be avoided, and the effect of low right atrial septal versus right atrial appendage pacing on cumulative ventricular pacing was unclear.
Does low right atrial septal pacing reduce cumulative percent ventricular pacing compared to right atrial appendage pacing in patients with sinus node disease?
Cohort (n=102)
Does low right atrial septal pacing reduce cumulative percent ventricular pacing compared to right atrial appendage pacing in patients with sinus node disease?
Low right atrial septal pacing significantly reduces unnecessary ventricular pacing and shortens AV intervals compared to traditional right atrial appendage pacing in patients with sinus node disease.
May reduce unnecessary ventricular pacing in sinus node disease; leaves open confirmation in randomized outcome trials.
BACKGROUND: Unnecessary ventricular pacing in sinus node disease (SND) must be avoided. To test the hypothesis that in SND, with or without 1st degree atrioventricular (AV) block, cumulative percent ventricular pacing (cum%VP) can be limited by low right atrial septal (LRAS) instead of right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing. METHODS: We studied 102 dual-chamber pacemaker recipients with SND. The PQ interval on 12-lead electrocardiogram and the atrial paced to ventricular sensed interval (Ap-Vs) during LRAS and RAA pacing were measured and compared at implantation, 3 months and 1 year of follow-up. Group 1 included 62 patients with baseline PQ interval <200 milliseconds during LRAS (n = 28) versus RAA (n = 34) pacing. Group 2 included 40 patients with baseline PQ ≥200 milliseconds during LRAS (n = 20) versus RAA (n = 20) pacing. cum%VP were measured at 3 months and 1 year. RESULTS: The characteristics and AV conduction properties were similar and the Ap-Vs interval was significantly shorter in the LRAS than in the RAA pacing group up to 1 year (193 ± 32 milliseconds vs. 220 ± 27 milliseconds in Group 1; P = 0.003, 222 ± 41 milliseconds vs. 281 ± 30 milliseconds in Group 2; P < 0.001). While cumulative percent atrial pacing was consistently similar, cum%VP was significantly smaller during LRAS than RAA pacing (1 ± 1% vs. 8 ± 18% in Group 1; P = 0.03, 7 ± 10% vs. 48 ± 38% in Group 2; P < 0.001). Similar observations were made with or without left atrial (LA) enlargement. CONCLUSION: Compared with RAA, LRAS pacing showed shorter AV interval in SND patients with or without 1st degree AV block and LA enlargement. This beneficial effect persisted through 1-year follow-up, and decreased cum%VP significantly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watabe et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Sinus node disease (n=102). Low right atrial septal (LRAS) pacing vs. Right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing was evaluated on Cumulative percent ventricular pacing (cum%VP). Low right atrial septal pacing significantly decreased cumulative ventricular pacing at 1 year compared to right atrial appendage pacing in sinus node disease (7% vs 48% for PQ≥200ms, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: