Key result
DES for in-stent restenosis linked to ~4-fold higher risk of CV death or AMI.
Why the study?
Clinical in-stent restenosis (CISR) is the main limitation of coronary angioplasty with stent implantation, and its clinical and angiographic characteristics and outcomes require description.
Cohort (n=110)
Hazard Ratio: 4.36 (95% CI 1.44–12.85)
p-value: p=0.009
Patients with clinical in-stent restenosis frequently present with acute coronary syndrome and face high rates of adverse events, with clinical treatment alone and bare metal stenting predicting worse outcomes.
Choice of therapy for in-stent restenosis may affect cardiovascular outcomes; leaves open optimal strategy for randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Clinical in-stent restenosis (CISR) is the main limitation of coronary angioplasty with stent implantation. OBJECTIVE: Describe the clinical and angiographic characteristics of CISR and the outcomes over a minimum follow-up of 12 months after its diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: We analyzed in 110 consecutive patients with CISR the clinical presentation, angiographic characteristics, treatment and combined primary outcomes (cardiovascular death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction [AMI]) and combined secondary (unstable angina with hospitalization, target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization) during a minimal follow-up of one year. RESULTS: Mean age was 61 ± 11 years (68.2% males). Clinical presentations included acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in 62.7% and proliferative ISR in 34.5%. CISR was treated with implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) in 36.4%, Bare Metal Stent (BMS) in 23.6%, myocardial revascularization surgery in 18.2%, balloon angioplasty in 15.5% and clinical treatment in 6.4%. During a median follow-up of 19.7 months, the primary outcome occurred in 18 patients, including 6 (5.5%) deaths and 13 (11.8%) AMI events. Twenty-four patients presented a secondary outcome. Predictors of the primary outcome were CISR with DES (HR = 4.36 [1.44-12.85]; p = 0.009) and clinical treatment for CISR (HR = 10.66 [2.53-44.87]; p = 0.001). Treatment of CISR with BMS (HR = 4.08 [1.75-9.48]; p = 0.001) and clinical therapy (HR = 6.29 [1.35-29.38]; p = 0.019) emerged as predictors of a secondary outcome. CONCLUSION: Patients with CISR present in most cases with ACS and with a high frequency of adverse events during a medium-term follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marino et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Clinical in-stent restenosis (CISR) (n=110). Drug-eluting stents (DES) or clinical treatment was evaluated on Combined cardiovascular death and nonfatal acute myocardial infarction (HR 4.36, 95% CI 1.44-12.85, p=0.009). Treatment of clinical in-stent restenosis with drug-eluting stents (HR 4.36; 95% CI 1.44-12.85) or clinical therapy (HR 10.66) were significant predictors of cardiovascular death or nonfatal AMI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: