Key result
Elevated copeptin fails to independently predict mortality or HF hospitalization after adjusting for NT-proBNP.
Why the study?
Underlying mechanisms of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction remain unknown, prompting investigation of copeptin as a biomarker in this population.
Does elevated copeptin predict all-cause mortality or HF hospitalisation in patients with HFpEF?
Observational (n=148)
Yes
Does elevated copeptin predict all-cause mortality or HF hospitalisation in patients with HFpEF?
Hazard Ratio: 1.56 (95% CI 1.03–2.38)
p-value: p=0.037
Copeptin is elevated in HFpEF and correlates with NT-proBNP, but its prognostic value for mortality and HF hospitalization is blunted after adjusting for NT-proBNP.
Copeptin should not guide HFpEF risk stratification until shown independent of NT-proBNP; leaves open additive value in larger cohorts.
INTRODUCTION: Underlying mechanisms of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) remain unknown. We explored copeptin, a biomarker of the arginine vasopressin system, hypothesising that copeptin in HFPEF is elevated, associated with diastolic dysfunction and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and predictive of HF hospitalisation and mortality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a prospective observational substudy of the The Karolinska Rennes (KaRen) 86 patients with symptoms of acute HF and ejection fraction (EF) ≥45% were enrolled. After 4-8 weeks, blood sampling and echocardiography was performed. Plasma-copeptin was analysed in 86 patients and 62 healthy controls. Patients were followed in median 579 days (quartile 1; quartile 3 (Q1;Q3) 276;1178) regarding the composite end point all-cause mortality or HF hospitalisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The patients with HFPEF had higher copeptin levels, median 13.56 pmol/L (Q1;Q3 8.56;20.55) than controls 5.98 pmol/L (4.15;9.42; p<0.001). Diastolic dysfunction, assessable in 75/86 patients, was present in 45 and absent in 30 patients. Copeptin did not differ regarding diastolic dysfunction and did not correlate with cardiac function but with NT-proBNP (r=0.223; p value=0.040). In univariate Cox regression analysis log copeptin predicted the composite end point (HR 1.56 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.38; p value=0.037)) but not after adjusting for NT-proBNP (HR 1.39 (95% CI 0.91 to 2.12; p value=0.125)). CONCLUSIONS: In the present patients with HFPEF, copeptin is elevated, correlates with NT-proBNP but not markers of diastolic dysfunction, and has prognostic implications, however blunted after adjustment for NT-proBNP. The HFPEF pathophysiology may be better reflected by markers of neurohormonal activation than by diastolic dysfunction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00774709.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hage et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) (n=148). Copeptin vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalisation (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.38, p=0.037). Elevated log copeptin predicted all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization (HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.03-2.38; P=0.037), but this association was no longer significant after adjusting for NT-proBNP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: