Key result
Gradual reperfusion significantly reduces myocardial interstitial edema at 60 minutes vs abrupt reperfusion.
Why the study?
Reperfusion injury occurs in human myocardium following coronary surgery and its attenuation by mode of reperfusion was unclear.
Does a gradual mode of reperfusion reduce myocardial and microvascular injury compared to an abrupt mode in patients undergoing coronary surgery?
Does a gradual mode of reperfusion reduce myocardial and microvascular injury compared to an abrupt mode in patients undergoing coronary surgery?
p-value: p=0.005
A gradual mode of reperfusion during coronary surgery may attenuate reperfusion injury, specifically interstitial edema, compared to an abrupt mode.
May support gradual reperfusion to limit edema in coronary surgery; hypothesis-generating and requires RCT confirmation before practice change.
In 14 patients undergoing coronary surgery, repeated atrial biopsies were obtained before and at the end of ischemia, and at 20 and 60 min of reperfusion. In half of the patients reperfusion was initiated with an abrupt rise in blood temperature and pressure, in the other half with a gradual rise. The biopsies were prepared for transmission electron microscopy and analyzed by stereological technique. In all biopsies, myocytic injury, as revealed by mitochondrial changes and intracellular edema, occurred following ischemia (P = 0.0003 and 0.007, respectively). The intracellular edema regressed following 20 min of reperfusion (P = 0.008). The myocytic mitochondrial changes persisted during reperfusion towards the end of the observation period (P = 0.0001). Interstitial edema increased following ischemia (P = 0.007) and persisted following 60 min of reperfusion (P = 0.009). The capillary part was significantly reduced after 20 min of reperfusion (P = 0.003), probably reflecting interstitial edema. Most changes were reversible in nature, although foci of irreversible changes were shown. In patients with a gradual start of reperfusion there was a significant regression of interstitial edema (P = 0.005) at 60 min reperfusion compared to the patients with an abrupt start, where the same changes seemed to persist or even increase. The study demonstrates that "reperfusion injury" occurs in human myocardium. It can be discerned from "ischemic" injury, and it may be reduced by a gentle mode of reperfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindal et al. (1995) studied Coronary surgery (n=14). Gradual rise in blood temperature and pressure during reperfusion vs. Abrupt rise in blood temperature and pressure was evaluated on Regression of interstitial edema at 60 min reperfusion (p=0.005). A gradual start of reperfusion during coronary surgery significantly regressed interstitial edema at 60 minutes compared to an abrupt start (P=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: