Key result
AI model on sinus rhythm ECGs predicts incident AF with ~0.78 C-index across risk tiers.
Why the study?
Prior studies used binary classifiers to identify patients at risk of AF from normal ECGs, overlooking clinically relevant time-to-event information.
Does a survival-based model using normal sinus rhythm ECGs predict 1-year incident atrial fibrillation in arrhythmia-naïve patients?
Cohort (n=26,015)
No
Does a survival-based model using normal sinus rhythm ECGs predict 1-year incident atrial fibrillation in arrhythmia-naïve patients?
Effect estimate: C-index 0.781
Absolute Event Rate: 49.8% vs 5.1%
p-value: p=<0.0001
A survival-based machine learning model using normal sinus rhythm ECGs can effectively stratify arrhythmia-naïve patients into risk groups for developing atrial fibrillation within one year.
Background Prior studies used binary classifiers to identify patients at risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF) from normal electrocardiograms (ECGs), overlooking clinically relevant time-to-event information. Objective To develop a survival-based model to estimate AF risk from normal ECGs in patients without prior AF and stratify them into risk groups up to one year before AF onset. Methods This retrospective cohort included patients with ECGs evaluated at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between 2022 and 2023 (index visit). We identified patients with prior normal sinus rhythm ECGs within one year before the index visit, where primary outcome was new-onset AF detected on the index ECG. From prior ECGs, we extracted 417 features and trained multiple survival models to predict incident AF. Data were split into training (60%), validation (15%), and test (25%) sets. The best-performing model, by validation C-index, stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Kaplan–Meier curves evaluated time-to-AF across risk groups. Interpretability analyses identified ECG features associated with AF risk. Results Among 26,015 patients (age 62±19; females 52%; average follow-up 80±100 days; AF incidence 23.1%), the gradient boosting survival model achieved highest performance (test C-index 0.781). It stratified 72.8%, 23.2%, and 4.0% of patients into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups, with AF incidence rates of 5.1%, 21.5%, and 49.8% (log-rank χ 2 =838.9, p<0.0001). Predictors included older age, lower P wave amplitude, and increased heart rate variability. Conclusion Survival modeling of normal sinus ECGs enables time-dependent AF risk estimation and clinically actionable risk-group stratification, extending beyond binary classification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riek et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=26,015). Gradient boosting survival model using ECG features vs. Low-risk group was evaluated on New-onset AF detected on the index ECG (C-index 0.781, p=<0.0001). A gradient boosting survival model using normal sinus rhythm ECGs predicted incident atrial fibrillation (test C-index 0.781), stratifying patients into groups with 5.1% to 49.8% AF rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: