Key result
High right atrial septal leadless pacemaker maintains stable electrical parameters through 6 months without complications.
Why the study?
Alternative implantation sites for atrial leadless pacemakers are needed after unsuccessful conventional right atrial appendage placement.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Implantation of an atrial leadless pacemaker at the high right atrial septum may be a technically feasible alternative with stable pacing parameters when conventional right atrial appendage placement is unsuccessful.
Successful in one case with stable parameters; leaves open broader safety and efficacy pending prospective data.
After unsuccessful implantation at the conventional right atrial appendage site, an atrial leadless pacemaker was implanted at the high right atrial septum. Electrical parameters were maintained during 6-month follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ono et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Symptomatic bradycardia due to complete atrioventricular block (n=1). Atrial leadless pacemaker implantation at the high right atrial septum was evaluated on Maintenance of electrical pacing parameters at 6 months. Implantation of an atrial leadless pacemaker at the high right atrial septum maintained stable electrical parameters during a 6-month follow-up without complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: