Key result
Ostial LAD CTO location is linked to ~57% lower technical success versus non-ostial sites.
Why the study?
The anatomical location of LAD CTO may influence procedural complexity and technical success beyond conventional CTO scores.
Does ostial location of LAD CTO reduce technical success compared to proximal or mid/distal locations in patients undergoing PCI?
Cohort (n=644)
Yes
Does ostial location of LAD CTO reduce technical success compared to proximal or mid/distal locations in patients undergoing PCI?
Odds Ratio: 0.43 (95% CI 0.21–0.87)
p-value: p=0.019
Ostial LAD CTOs are associated with significantly lower technical success and higher procedural complexity compared to proximal or mid/distal lesions, independent of established CTO scores.
May heighten procedural caution for ostial LAD CTO PCI; leaves open whether location refines J-CTO predictions.
BACKGROUND: The anatomical location of left anterior descending artery (LAD) chronic total occlusion (CTO) may influence procedural complexity and technical success beyond conventional CTO scores. AIMS: We evaluated the association between LAD CTO location and procedural characteristics and outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing LAD CTO percutaneous coronary intervention at three centers between 2019 and 2026 were classified as having ostial, proximal, or mid/distal CTOs. Lesion complexity, crossing strategy, resource utilization, and in-hospital outcomes were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was adjusted for clinical characteristics and either the J-CTO or EuroCTO score. RESULTS: Among 2157 CTO procedures, 644 involved the LAD: 81 ostial, 144 proximal, and 419 mid/distal lesions. Ostial CTOs had greater anatomical complexity and required a retrograde approach more frequently than proximal and mid/distal lesions (43.2% vs. 20.1% vs. 14.1%; p < 0.001). They were also associated with longer procedures, greater guidewire use, and higher contrast volume. Technical success was lower in ostial lesions (77.8% vs. 89.6% vs. 92.6%; p < 0.001), whereas in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events were similar. Ostial location remained independently associated with lower technical success after adjustment for the J-CTO score (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.21-0.87; p = 0.019) or EuroCTO score (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20-0.84; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Ostial LAD CTOs require retrograde strategies more often and have lower technical success despite adjustment for established CTO scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sural et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Left anterior descending artery (LAD) chronic total occlusion (CTO) (n=644). Ostial LAD CTO location vs. Proximal and mid/distal LAD CTO locations was evaluated on Technical success (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.87, p=0.019). Ostial LAD CTO location was independently associated with lower technical success compared to other locations after adjustment for J-CTO score (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.21-0.87; p=0.019).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: