Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of topical bromfenac 0.09% on pain following intravitreal (IVT) injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medications in patients diagnosed as having choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration or other etiologies, diabetic macular edema, diabetic retinopathy, or macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion. Methods: A total of 78 adult patients scheduled to receive bilateral anti-VEGF IVT injections were randomized to receive topical bromfenac 0.09% in 1 eye and artificial tears in the fellow eye (control) immediately before the anti-VEGF treatment at 2 academic institutions from March 2021 to June 2022. Pain was evaluated using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (score range, 0–10) and the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (score range, 0–5) at baseline (preinjection) and 5 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours following injection. Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was used for statistical comparisons. Results: In total, 156 eyes were analyzed. Mean baseline pain scores were similar between the bromfenac 0.09% and control groups. Five minutes after injection, eyes randomized to receive bromfenac 0.09% had significantly less pain compared with control eyes receiving artificial tears, on both the Wong-Baker FACES scale (mean raw score, 2.29 vs 2.79; P = .0275) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (mean raw score, 1.13 vs 2.36; P = .0135). No significant difference in pain scores was noted at 6 hours or 24 hours post–IVT injection. Conclusions: Bromfenac 0.09% solution administered to the study eye before IVT anti-VEGF injection reduced pain 5 minutes after injection in comparison with artificial tears. There was no difference in pain between the 2 groups at 6 hours or 24 hours post–IVT injection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Achuck et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: