Key result
Acute HF hospitalization linked to ~32-point increase in use of ≥3 GDMT classes at discharge.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
Guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure is often underused in older frail patients, and determinants of low-prescription need assessment.
Does hospitalization for acute or acutely decompensated heart failure serve as an effective window to increase the prescription rates of guideline-directed medical therapy in older and frail patients?
Observational (n=701)
Yes
Does hospitalization for acute or acutely decompensated heart failure serve as an effective window to increase the prescription rates of guideline-directed medical therapy in older and frail patients?
Hospitalization for acute heart failure provides a valuable opportunity to intensify guideline-directed medical therapy in older, frail patients, though significant prescribing gaps persist for those with extreme age, advanced CKD, and dementia.
BACKGROUND Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF) is often underused in older frail patients. We assessed discharge prescribing and determinants of low-prescription across Internal Medicine and Geriatrics wards in Tuscany, Italy. METHODS This prospective, multicenter, observational study included adults hospitalized for acute or acutely decompensated chronic HF (November 2024-July 2025) in 16 wards. Primary endopoint: prescription rates and change from home to discharge in the use of RAAS-i/ARNI, beta-blockers, MRAs, and SGLT2-i (McNemar's test corrected with Bonferroni rule for a = 0.0125). Predictors of under-prescription (≤2 classes at discharge) were explored using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS We enrolled 701 patients (44% male), with a median age of 85 years (IQR 80-89), 31 deceased. HFpEF 50.5%, HFmrEF 22.3%, HFrEF 22.8%. At discharge, the use of ≥3 drug classes rose from 23.4% to 55.4% (absolute +32.4 points; p < 0.001) and of all four classes from 6.6% to 24% (absolute +17.5; p < 0.001). Class-specific changes: RAAS-i 57.3%→63.1% (p = 0.056), MRAs 27.5%→58.5% (p < 0.001), beta-blockers 68.8%→84.6% (p < 0.001), SGLT2-i 22.2%→52.2% (p < 0.001). Gains were consistent across LVEF strata, although HFpEF remained less intensively treated; loop-diuretic use increased to 96% at discharge (median 75 mg furosemide-equivalent). Independent correlates of ≤2 classes were age >85 years (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.13-2.21), eGFR <30 ml/min (OR 3.13; 1.73-5.66), BNP <760 pg/ml (OR 1.95; 1.23-3,11), and dementia (OR 1.52; 1.07-2.17). SGLT2-i were less frequently prescribed in very old patients, those with advanced CKD, and low BNP levels; RAAS-i were less used in older patients, those with AF, impaired mobility, and CKD. CONCLUSIONS Hospitalization is a pragmatic window for intensifying GDMT, even in very old, multimorbid patients. Residual gaps-especially for SGLT2-i and, to a lesser extent, RAAS-i- in the context of advanced age, dementia, and CKD call for targeted implementation strategies that balance efficacy, safety, and goals of care in frailty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cei et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute or acutely decompensated chronic heart failure (n=701). Hospitalization vs. Pre-admission (home) was evaluated on Prescription rates and change from home to discharge in the use of RAAS-i/ARNI, beta-blockers, MRAs, and SGLT2-i (p=<0.001). Hospitalization for acute heart failure was associated with an increase in the use of ≥3 GDMT classes from 23.4% at home to 55.4% at discharge (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: