Key result
Delayed pericardial patch removal after sutureless cardiac rupture repair triggers emergency re-rupture over unhealed myocardium.
Why the study?
Surgical treatment is the only reliable option for LVFWR, but late complications such as ventricular pseudoaneurysm after sutureless repair are not well characterized.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This case highlights the risk of unexpected cardiac re-rupture when removing pericardial patches late after a sutureless repair for left ventricular free wall rupture, as the underlying tissue may be replaced by an organizing hematoma rather than stable fibrous tissue.
INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment is the only reliable therapeutic option for a left ventricular free wall rupture (LVFWR). There are 2 major surgical techniques, namely, sutureless repair and sutured repair; a ventricular pseudoaneurysm is a late postoperative complication. We herein report a case of a re-ruptured left ventricular pseudoaneurysm after a sutureless bovine pericardial patch repair.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Usui et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm after sutureless repair for cardiac rupture (n=1). Removal of pericardial patches was evaluated on Clinical outcome. Removal of pericardial patches 10 months after a sutureless repair for a cardiac rupture led to an emergency re-rupture, revealing that the underlying myocardial tissue had been replaced by an organizing hematoma.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: