Key result
Baseline ventricular efficiency fails to independently predict FMR improvement in HFrEF after adjusting for filling pressures.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
Predicting the improvement of functional mitral regurgitation to medical therapy in HFrEF patients is an important yet overlooked clinical issue.
Does baseline echocardiographic assessment of LV mechanoenergetic parameters and LV volumes predict the improvement of functional mitral regurgitation in HFrEF patients starting sacubitril/valsartan?
Cohort (n=662)
Open-label
Yes
Does baseline echocardiographic assessment of LV mechanoenergetic parameters and LV volumes predict the improvement of functional mitral regurgitation in HFrEF patients starting sacubitril/valsartan?
Odds Ratio: 1.11
p-value: p=0.491
Baseline echocardiographic parameters, particularly E/e' and LVEDVi, can modestly predict the improvement of functional mitral regurgitation in HFrEF patients undergoing medical therapy optimization with sacubitril/valsartan.
LV mechanoenergetic parameters may identify HFrEF patients likely to improve FMR on medical therapy; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND Predicting the improvement of functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) to medical therapy is an important, yet overlooked, clinical issue. The objective of the study was to evaluate whether echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular (LV) mechanoenergetic parameters and of LV volumes is associated with improvement of FMR in HFrEF patients after optimization of pharmacological therapy. METHODS The study included 662 patients with chronic HFrEF prospectively enrolled in a multicenter, open-label registry before starting sacubitril/valsartan. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and repeated at 6-12 months. A simplified, non-invasive echocardiographic P/V loop model was used, based on brachial arterial pressure and transthoracic two-dimensional Doppler echocardiographic data. RESULTS Patients with FMR improvement showed greater gains in LV function and mechanoenergetics. In the subgroup of 279 patients with moderate/severe FMR, age, ventricular efficiency (VE) and LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) were independently associated with FMR improvement in the primary model. Individual discrimination was modest. In a post-hoc sensitivity analysis adding baseline E/e', VE was no longer significant (OR 1.11; p = 0.491), whereas E/e' was independently associated with FMR improvement (model AUC 0.704 to 0.762). CONCLUSIONS The combined assessment of echocardiography-derived VE and LVEDVi was associated with FMR improvement in the primary model; however, VE was no longer independently associated after additional adjustment for baseline E/e'. FMR improvement was closely associated with LV reverse remodeling, although a causal direction cannot be established from this observational study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghio et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in chronic HFrEF (n=662). Echocardiographic parameters (ventricular efficiency and LVEDVi) was evaluated on Improvement of functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) (OR 1.11, p=0.491). Echocardiography-derived ventricular efficiency and LVEDVi were associated with FMR improvement in HFrEF patients, though ventricular efficiency lost significance after adjusting for baseline E/e'.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: