Key result
Anaesthetists fail to accurately predict postoperative hypotension after non-cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
Prediction of postoperative hypotension after non-cardiac surgery is difficult and its accuracy by anaesthetists is unclear.
Can anaesthetists accurately predict postoperative hypotension in the first 48 hours after non-cardiac surgery?
Cohort (n=100)
No
Can anaesthetists accurately predict postoperative hypotension in the first 48 hours after non-cardiac surgery?
Effect estimate: AUROC 0.54 (95% CI 0.44-0.64)
Anaesthetists were unable to accurately predict postoperative hypotension in high-risk non-cardiac surgical patients, indicating a need for better objective prediction tools.
Anaesthetist judgment alone should not guide postoperative hypotension monitoring; supports development of objective prediction tools in prospective studies.
Hypotension after surgery is common and associated with poor clinical outcomes. Prediction of hypotension is difficult. We aimed to characterise whether anaesthetists can predict hypotension in the first 48 h after non-cardiac surgery. We conducted a single-centre, prospective cohort study of anaesthetist-patient pairs during non-cardiac surgery. We asked anaesthetists to predict whether hypotension (systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg) would occur in the first 48 h. We determined patients’ blood pressures over 48 h via the electronic medical record. We assessed anaesthetists’ predictions using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). We recruited 100 anaesthetist-patient pairs involving 49 individual anaesthetists. Hypotension occurred in 33 patients (33%). The true positive rate was 13%, the true negative rate was 46%, the false positive rate was 21% and the false negative rate was 20%, and accuracy was 59%. The AUROC was 0.54 (95% CI 0.44–0.64). The observed sensitivity was 39% (95% CI 23–58%), specificity was 69% (95% CI 56–79%), positive predictive value was 38% (95% CI 24–43%), negative predictive value was 70% (95% CI 26–52%), positive likelihood ratio was 1.3 (95%CI 0.7–2.2), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.9 (95% CI 0.6–1.2). Adjusting for multiple predictions made by individual anaesthetists did not alter the interpretation of the results. Anaesthetists were unable to accurately predict postoperative hypotension. Better prediction tools are required to guide practice in high-risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Douglas et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Postoperative hypotension (n=100). Anaesthetists' clinical prediction was evaluated on Accuracy of predicting hypotension (systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg) in the first 48 hours after surgery (AUROC 0.54, 95% CI 0.44-0.64). Anaesthetists were unable to accurately predict postoperative hypotension within 48 hours of non-cardiac surgery, achieving an overall accuracy of 59% and an AUROC of 0.54.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: