Key result
Combining HOMA-IR with HbA1c improves future T2D risk classification over HbA1c alone.
Why the study?
Current risk assessment for type 2 diabetes focuses on elevated glycemia but has imperfect sensitivity and specificity, and considering insulin resistance may improve diagnostic precision.
Cohort (n=2,205)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May refine risk stratification when adding HOMA-IR to HbA1c in whites; leaves open validation, generalizability, and practice change.
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) prevalence increases unabated even as interventions focused on individuals at high risk can prevent T2D (1). Best approaches to identify individuals at high risk continue to be refined. Current risk assessment focuses on elevated glycemia, commonly estimated by fasting glucose (FG) and HbA1c levels, despite imperfect sensitivity and specificity (2). We previously showed that risk for T2D increases progressively as HbA1c increases, independently and in addition to increasing FG (3,4). As risk assessment for T2D depends on more than glycemia alone, simultaneous consideration of another physiological axis may improve biomarker-based diagnostic precision. Here, we test the hypothesis that simultaneous consideration of HbA1c and insulin resistance (IR), assessed with fasting insulin as HOMA of IR (HOMA-IR), can substantially improve risk assessment for T2D. We have previously detailed our statistical approach, IR and T2D diagnostic criteria, and particulars of the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) (3). Using the same FHS data and excluding those with T2D at baseline, we categorized individuals according to HbA1c <5.7% or 5.7–6.49% and into HOMA-IR tertiles and followed them for a mean (SD) of 16.4 (4.5) years for incident T2D. Age- and sex-adjusted T2D incidence rates and counts of subjects are shown in Fig. 1 A for all …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meigs et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Risk for future Type 2 Diabetes (n=2,205). Simultaneous consideration of HbA1c and HOMA-IR vs. HbA1c alone was evaluated on Incident Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). Simultaneous consideration of HbA1c and HOMA-IR significantly improved the correct classification of future type 2 diabetes risk compared to HbA1c alone in white individuals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: