Key result
Admission plasma fibrinogen fails to predict subsequent coronary events in patients with acute MI.
Why the study?
The independent prognostic importance of plasma fibrinogen levels after acute myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolysis was uncertain.
Cohort (n=135)
p-value: p=0.70
Admission fibrinogen offers no prognostic value for post-MI events; leaves open its biomarker role in refined cohorts or serial testing.
The aim of our study was to prove or disprove the independent prognostic importance of fibrinogen after myocardial infarction. Plasma fibrinogen levels were determined on admission in 135 patients with an acute myocardial infarction and symptoms up to 4 h (mean: 1.8 h) immediately before starting fibrinolytic treatment with 1.5 mio U. streptokinase i.v. All patients were free from other diseases which are known to cause elevated fibrinogen levels. Coronary angiography was carried out in 87%. During a mean follow-up period of 26.2 months 31 coronary events could be observed in 26 patients: 18 reinfarctions, 6 cases of sudden death, and 7 coronary artery bypass graft surgeries because of new symptoms. While plasma fibrinogen levels were higher in smokers than in non-smokers (3.30 vs 2.94 g/l p = 0.011) and correlated with the number of involved coronary arteries (p = 0.08), values were similar in patients with and without coronary events during follow-up (3.07 vs 3.16 g/l, p = 0.70). This applied as well to univariate analysis as to multivariate Cox's regression model. We conclude that plasma fibrinogen levels determined very early in patients with acute myocardial infarction do correlate with other important prognostic variables, but have no independent prognostic importance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pollak et al. (1991) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=135). Admission plasma fibrinogen levels was evaluated on Coronary events (reinfarction, sudden death, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery) (p=0.70). Admission plasma fibrinogen levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction did not differ between those with and without subsequent coronary events (3.07 vs 3.16 g/l, p=0.70).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: