Key result
Biphasic electric field stimulation matches monophasic activation via synergistic inward sodium current summation.
Why the study?
The implications of the close proximity of oppositely polarized membranes on cardiac cell excitability during extracellular electric field stimulation have not been explored.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vitro comparison of field vs intracellular stimulation leaves open effects of nonuniform polarization on cardiac excitability; further studies needed.
Electrical stimulation of cardiac cells by imposed extracellular electric fields results in a transmembrane potential which is highly nonuniform, with one end of the cell depolarized and the other end hyperpolarized along the field direction. To date, the implications of the close proximity of oppositely polarized membranes on excitability have not been explored. In this work we compare the biophysical basis for field stimulation of cells at rest with that for intracellular current injection, using three Luo-Rudy type membrane patches coupled together as a lumped model to represent the cell membrane. Our model shows that cell excitation is a function of the temporal and spatial distribution of ionic currents and transmembrane potential. The extracellular and intracellular forms of stimulation were compared in greater detail for monophasic and symmetric biphasic rectangular pulses, with duration ranging from 0.5 to 10 ms. Strength-duration curves derived for field stimulation show that over a wide range of pulse durations, biphasic waveforms can recruit and activate membrane patches about as effectively as can monophasic waveforms having the same total pulse duration. We find that excitation with biphasic stimulation results from a synergistic, temporal summation of inward currents through the sodium channel in membrane patches at opposite ends of the cell. Furthermore, with both waveform types, a net inward current through the inwardly rectifying potassium channel contributes to initial membrane depolarization. In contrast, models of stimulation by intracellular current injection do not account for the nonuniformity of transmembrane potential and produce substantially different (even contradictory) results for the case of stimulation from rest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tung et al. (1992) studied this question. Extracellular electric field stimulation vs. Intracellular current injection was evaluated on Cell excitation and temporal/spatial distribution of ionic currents. Extracellular electric field stimulation with biphasic waveforms activates membrane patches as effectively as monophasic waveforms via synergistic temporal summation of inward sodium currents.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: