Key result
Round heart disease shortens left ventricular APD50 by ~12% compared to controls.
Why the study?
Arrhythmias are commonly recorded in round heart disease, a presumed viral cardiomyopathy of turkeys, but the cellular electrophysiological changes associated with arrhythmia susceptibility are unclear.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cellular EP changes in turkey cardiomyopathy model are hypothesis-generating; leaves open relevance to human arrhythmia mechanisms.
Arrhythmias are commonly recorded in "round heart disease", a presumed viral, congestive cardiomyopathy of turkeys. To assess whether cellular electrophysiological changes may be associated with arrhythmia susceptibility, we compared transmembrane action potential characteristics in left and right ventricular endocardial muscle fibres from 19 inbred myopathic turkeys with findings in 13 normal control turkeys (age 1 to 74 days). In left ventricular tissue, as a group, action potential duration at 50% repolarisation (APD50) was reduced in myopathic hearts (201+/-6(SEM) vs 228+/-9 ms in controls. P less than 0.01), while the maximum rate of phase 0 (dV/dtmax) action potential amplitude, diastolic resting membrane potential and action potential duration at 90% repolarisation (APD90) did not differ from control turkeys. By contrast, in myopathic right ventricular tissue, as a group, both APD50 (186+/-5 vs 206+/-4 ms in controls) and APD90 (208+/-4 vs 228+/-3 ms in controls) were shorter (P less than 0.01). The plateau potential in both right and left ventricular tissue was significantly higher in inbred turkeys. Since a spectrum of cardiac dilatation and hypertrophy is present in myopathic turkeys, we examined the effect of hypertrophy on action potential characteristics. In "round heart disease" turkeys, left ventricular hypertrophy was characterised by reduced dV/dtmax (98+/- vs 274+/-26 V.s-1, P less than 0.01) and right ventricular hypertrophy by further shortening of both APD50 (174+/-7 vs 202+/-6 ms, P less than 0.01) and APD90 (193+/- vs 224+/-5 ms, P less than 0.01), but no change in dV/dtmax (105+/-13 vs 120+/-9 V.s-1, P = NS). These results indicate that certain electrophysiological differences (eg reduced action potential duration), may, in part, contribute to dysrhythmia susceptibility in this presumed viral cardiomyopathy model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
EINZIG et al. (1981) studied Round heart disease (congestive cardiomyopathy) (n=32). Round heart disease (myopathy) vs. Normal control turkeys was evaluated on Action potential duration at 50% repolarisation (APD50) in left ventricular tissue (p=<0.01). In turkeys with 'round heart disease', left ventricular action potential duration at 50% repolarisation was significantly reduced compared to normal controls (201 vs 228 ms, P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: