Key result
Ultralow-dose radiation protocol linked to ~59% lower radiation dose during device implantation without compromising safety.
Why the study?
Radiation exposure during electrophysiological device implantation, especially CRT devices, remains a significant hazard requiring evaluation of ultralow-dose protocols.
Population
1173 patients undergoing de novo electrophysiological device implantation
Comparison
Ultralow-dose radiation protocol vs conventional low-dose protocol
Design
Cohort study comparing two radiation protocols at a single hospital
Authors
Loading...
Ultralow-dose protocols may safely cut radiation exposure in device implantation; supports wider use but leaves open need for randomized trials.
Cohort (n=1,173)
No
Effect estimate: 59% reduction
Absolute Event Rate: 0.1% vs 0.25%
p-value: p=<.0001
Eichenlaub et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Electrophysiological device implantation (n=1,173). Ultralow-dose radiation protocol vs. Conventional low-dose protocol was evaluated on Effective radiation dose per procedure (59% reduction, p=<.0001). An ultralow-dose radiation protocol for electrophysiological device implantation reduced effective radiation doses by 59% (median 0.10 vs 0.25 mSv; P<.0001) without compromising success or safety.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: