Key result
Heart failure was associated with significantly longer resting QTc intervals (471±10 ms) compared to normal controls (421±6 ms, P<0.05), but this difference was absent at peak exercise.
Why the study?
The dependence on heart rate of QT interval prolongation in left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure, and its relationship to autonomic dysfunction or prognosis, has not been well studied.
Cross-Sectional (n=66)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
QT prolongation in HF occurs only at low heart rates; leaves open whether QT/HR slope adds prognostic value beyond systolic function.
Abnormal left ventricular structure and function as in, for example, left ventricular hypertrophy or chronic heart failure, is associated with sudden cardiac death and, when the ejection fraction is depressed, with prolongation of the QT interval. The dependence on heart rate of QT interval prolongation in these conditions, and the relationship of any abnormalities either to deranged autonomic nervous system function or to an adverse prognosis, has not been well studied. We therefore investigated (1) the dependence on heart rate of the QT interval, and (2) the relationship between both QT interval and the QT/heart rate slope and markers of adverse prognosis in these two conditions. The QT interval was measured at rest and during exercise in 34 subjects with heart failure, 16 subjects with left ventricular hypertrophy and 16 age-matched controls with normal left ventricular structure and function. QTc (corrected QT) intervals at rest were significantly longer in heart failure patients (471±10 ms) than in controls (421±6 ms) or in subjects with hypertrophy (420±6 ms) (P < 0.05). At peak exercise, despite the attainment of similar heart rates, the QT intervals no longer differed from each other, being 281±7 ms for controls, 296±11 ms in hypertrophy and 303±10 ms in heart failure (no significant difference). The QT/heart rate slope was significantly increased in heart failure [2.3±0.1 ms·(beats/min)-1] compared with controls [1.55±0.06 ms·(beats/min)-1] and hypertrophy [1.66±0.1 ms·(beats/min)-1] (P < 0.001). In left ventricular hypertrophy, despite animal data suggesting that QT interval prolongation should occur, no abnormalities were found in QT intervals at rest or during exercise. The QT/heart rate slope did not relate to any markers for an adverse prognosis, except that of prolongation of QT interval. Long QT intervals were associated principally with impairment of left ventricular systolic function. Our data emphasize the dynamic nature of the QT interval abnormalities found in heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davey et al. (2000) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure and left ventricular hypertrophy (n=66). Heart failure vs. Normal controls and left ventricular hypertrophy was evaluated on QTc (corrected QT) interval at rest (p=<0.05). Heart failure was associated with significantly longer resting QTc intervals (471±10 ms) compared to normal controls (421±6 ms, P<0.05), but this difference was absent at peak exercise.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: