Key result
Obesity linked to ~180% longer IV verapamil elimination half-life in hypertensive patients.
Why the study?
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of verapamil in obese hypertensive patients compared to normal-weight hypertensive patients were not well characterized.
Observational (n=23)
Absolute Event Rate: 10.1% vs 3.6%
p-value: p=< 0.005
May support total-body-weight verapamil dosing in obese hypertensives; leaves open prospective validation of attenuated responses.
Summary: Verapamil (0.15 mg/kg) was administered by 10-min intravenous infusion to 12 obese (127 ± 8 kg) and 11 normal weight (74 ± 4 kg) hypertensive patients. All subjects were of similar age and without clinical or laboratory evidence of cardiac or renal dysfunction. Verapamil plasma concentrations were determined and pharmacokinetic parameters derived. Electrocardiographic P-R interval, used as a measure of A-V nodal conduction, mean blood pressure, and heart rate were determined simultaneously with blood sampling for 24 h following the dose. Elimination half-life was prolonged in obese patients (10.1 ± 1.8 vs. 3.6 ± 0.4 h; p < 0.005) due to a marked increase in volume of distribution at steady-state (713 ± 99 vs. 301 ± 33 L; p < 0.005) with no change in total verapamil clearance [1,339 ± 180 obese vs. 1,250 ± 147 ml/min; not significant (NS)]. Verapamil plasma protein binding was similar between groups (percent unbound, 4.8 ± 0.5 obese vs. 5.1 ± 0.5%; NS). Using a sigmoid Emax pharmacodynamic model, Emax (maximal prolongation in P-R interval) was unchanged in obesity (53.7 ± 12.5 obese vs. 45.9 ± 12.0 ms; NS). However, EC50 (verapamil concentration required to achieve 50% of Emax prolongation in P-R interval) was greater in obese patients (45.9 ± 6.7 vs. 22.6 ± 2.0 ng/ml; p < 0.005). Reflex increase in heart rate after verapamil was less in obese (4 ± 2 vs. 11 ± 2 beats/min; p < 0.01) than control patients, although the maximum hypotensive effect was similar for both groups (−15 ± 3 vs. −10 ± 1 mm Hg; NS). The pharmacodynamic findings are consistent with either decreased direct verapamil effect and/or impaired baroreflex sensitivity, sympathetic, and parasympathetic reflex responses due to verapamil-induced hypotension in obese as compared to normal-weight hypertensive patients. The pharmacokinetic findings (increased volume of distribution, no change in clearance) in the context of the pharmacodynamic findings indicate that for similar clinical verapamil effect after single intravenous doses, verapamil dose should be increased as a function of total body weight in obese hypertensive patients, and even with this adjustment some drug effects may be attenuated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janice B. Schwartz (1988) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=23). Obesity vs. Normal weight was evaluated on Elimination half-life of verapamil (p=< 0.005). In hypertensive patients, obesity prolonged the elimination half-life of intravenous verapamil (10.1 vs 3.6 h; P<0.005) and increased its volume of distribution compared to normal-weight patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: