Key result
TTE eccentricity index fails to reliably assess RV function after lung resection.
Why the study?
Right ventricular dysfunction occurs after lung resection and is associated with postoperative morbidity, but noninvasive evaluation of RV function in this population is challenging and a reliable measure is needed.
Observational (n=27)
Images anonymized and randomized prior to offline analysis
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Caution against TTE eccentricity index for post-lung resection RV assessment; leaves open need for validated noninvasive CMR surrogates.
Context: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction occurs after lung resection and is associated with postoperative morbidity. Noninvasive evaluation of the RV is challenging, particularly in the postoperative period. A reliable measure of RV function would have value in this population. Aims: This study compares eccentricity index (EI) obtained by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) determined measures of RV function in a lung resection cohort. CMR is the reference method for noninvasive assessment of RV function. Design and Setting: Prospective observational cohort study at a single tertiary hospital. Materials and Methods: Twenty-eight patients scheduled for elective lung resection underwent contemporaneous TTE and CMR imaging preoperatively, on postoperative day (POD) 2 and at 2-month. Systolic and diastolic EI was measured offline from anonymized and randomized TTE and CMR images. Statistical Analysis: Bland–Altman analysis was performed to determine agreement between EITTE and EICMR. Changes over time and comparison with CMR determined RV ejection fraction (RVEFCMR) was assessed. Results: Bland–Altman analysis showed a negligible mean difference between EITTE and EICMR, but limits of agreement were wide (SD 0.24 and 0.28). There were no significant changes in EITTE and EICMR over time (P > 0.35). We found no association between EITTE with RVEFCMR at all-time points (P > 0.22). Systolic and diastolic EICMR on POD 2 demonstrated moderate association with RVEFCMR (r = −0.54 and r = −0.59, P ≤ 0.01). At 2-month, only diastolic EICMR correlated with RVEFCMR (r = −0.43, P = 0.03). There were no meaningful associations between EITTE and EICMR with TTE-derived RV systolic pressure (P > 0.31). Conclusions: TTE determined EI is not useful as a noninvasive method of assessing RV function following lung resection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teng et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Lung cancer requiring elective lung resection by thoracotomy (n=27). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) determined eccentricity index vs. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) determined eccentricity index and right ventricular ejection fraction was evaluated on Agreement between systolic eccentricity index measured by TTE and CMR (Mean difference 0.07, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.54). Transthoracic echocardiography-determined eccentricity index is not useful for noninvasive assessment of right ventricular function following lung resection due to wide limits of agreement with CMR and no association with right ventricular ejection fraction (P>0.22).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: